Home > Sudbury News

EnerGuide program axed by feds

As a former EnerGuide for Houses Advisor, I can testify that this is one program that has taken years to develop and it is crime to have it bashed without any input from Canadians. Homeowners...

Posted by: Doreen Ojala_4

Read All Comments

Article Tools

May 18, 2006

By: By Bill Bradley

Energy conservation programs, like EnerGuide For Houses and the One-Tonne Challenge, are being chopped by the new federal Conservative government.

FedNor and CBC Radio One Sudbury may be next, warns Nickel Belt MP Ray Bonin.

Bonin believes many federal programs are at risk with the federal Conservatives and Prime Minister Stephen Harper in charge.

“EnerGuide For Houses was a very popular program for my constituents. It made a difference in their heating costs and was good for the environment. I am raising this issue with the Liberal caucus, which I chair,” said Bonin.

“If this government ever gets a majority, then just watch what they will do. They will damage the economy, the environment and the social fabric of Canada. They don’t care about Northern Ontario. FedNor will be axed if they get a majority of seats. They already said they would.

Watch out for the local CBC station. They have a big payroll that contributes to our city’s economy. They could be shut down too.”

The EnerGuide program, in existence for eight years, encourages homeowners to make their homes more energy efficient. After completing a home-energy audit by local energy efficiency companies and completion of any recommended work, the homeowner can apply for a grant, which averaged $750 per household.

“We are reviewing all federal programs. That is part of our election promises to make government more accountable,” said Emma Welford, director of communications for Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn.

“We are winding the EnerGuide For Houses program down because we think there was not enough uptake by homeowners – only 35 percent nationally.

“We have been talking with the provinces to take over the program. So far Quebec and New Brunswick have agreed to continue the program at their expense. In the fall, we will be announcing a new program that will better target homeowners’ concerns about rising energy costs.”

Homeowners who completed the energy audit prior to May 12 can still go ahead with renovations and apply for the grant until March 2007, said Welford.


Chopping EnerGuide will hurt Sudbury’s economy, said Fraser Rees of Canspec Inspection Services of Sudbury.

“Those federal energy conservation grants have enticed Sudbury homeowners to spend additional money, totalling $5.5 million in Sudbury’s economy,” said Rees.

The main part of Canspec’s business is delivering the EnerGuide For Houses program.

Funding for the $44 million EnerGuide for Houses was axed in the May 2 federal budget but official notice only occurred last weekend on the Natural Resources Canada website.

Rees said the Harper government has also ended funding for the One-Tonne Challenge program that local organizations like EarthCare Sudbury and its community partners have championed to curb energy use in Sudbury.


Rees told Northern Life that a communiqué from Natural Resources Canada on Wednesday tells service providers that “any publications that refer to the EnerGuide grants or the One-Tonne Challenge should be recycled. Lawn signs should also be recycled and wooden stakes discarded.”

Rees anticipates more cuts are coming.

“In fact, we are fearing that the federal Office of Energy Efficiency will be axed as well. They co-ordinate energy efficiency efforts across the country, including the popular Energy Star appliance labelling program. That would be terrible considering the energy crisis we are facing in Ontario,” said Rees.

Bookmark and Share

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments or postings to myNews. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

2 Comments

  • As a former EnerGuide for Houses Advisor, I can testify that this is one program that has taken years to develop and it is crime to have it bashed without any input from Canadians. Homeowners most likely did do many simple upgrades that were not accounted for in the statistics quoted by the government, so for those of you out there who did recieve an EGH now is the time to send a message to Stephen Harper that you do not agree that this is not the time to slash these important climate change programs - the education alone to support the technicians that go into your homes itself will be lost and the EGH branding that everyone recognizes will be lost forever. This is regressive and for a minority government to have this much power confirms my belief that the democratic process in Canada is greatly flawed!!!!!

  • Chopping EnerGide doesn't make sense! Especially for those of us that live in Northern Ontario. Per capita, we spend a larger part of our budgets on heating (and cooling) our homes than Southerners. The unique Northern climate has us at a disadvantage over the vote rich Southern population. With the increase in fuel costs, and looming electricity shortages, the government is pushing an energy saving mandate. The bonus is a cleaner environment. This is a very short sighted cut. As for the CBC? It's outlived it's mandate. With Satellite Radio/TV, Cable and the Internet, we just don't need it anymore. Hundreds of thousands of Canadian tax dollars are spent to prop up this dinosaur that only a very few tune in to. Time to regulate the heck out of it and then sell it off. It's a money loser and a leftover of the Golden Age of radio.