Water Tower reno back on track

Aug 08, 2008- 7:11 PM

By:

BY BILL BRADLEY

An old eyesore on the city's skyline may be in for a radical transformation soon.

The Pearl Street water tower – a rusting hulk, rising high above the surroundings in the city's core – is to be discussed at Tuesday's planning committee meeting of city council, starting at 2 p.m. The tower sits on 1.3 acres fronting on Pearl Street.

The application, by Westar Investments Inc. is to add residential dwelling units to the abandoned structure, along with already approved restaurant and banquet facilities, and commercial office space.

On June 6, 2006, the planning committee approved a rezoning application by Cory Prause, a project manager for Hatch Associates, to permit the conversion of the abandoned Pearl Street water tower into restaurant, commercial office space, off-site parking and advertising billboards.

The initial proposal for the site outlined a potential for approximately 6,900 square feet of residential space, 6,900 square feet of office space or banquet facilities and 2,000 square feet of bar/lounge area, for a total of 16,000 square feet of floor space.

The plan was to convert the structure into a unique tourist attraction that would feature a restaurant, bar and lounge overlooking the city, and a number of commercial spaces. In a Northern Life article published in June 2006, Prause estimated it would take about $3.5 million, plus inflation, and more than two years to transform the structure.

As part of this proposal, advertising signs would be established between the pillars of the water tower.

This approval was conditional on a site plan agreement. The site plan has been finalized. The intent of the applicant now is to replace the advertising with proposed residential development. That would entail changing the zoning from C3-23 Limited General Commercial Special to C3-S Limited General Commercial Special. The applicant also owns land across the street that could be utilized for parking if required.

Read More: Home > Sudbury News

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

11 Comments

  • I think this is a GREAT idea, sure to create revenue as well as be a tourist attraction and hot spot!

  • Maybe the City could start charging rent to the pidgeons that inhabit those God-awful silos in the Flour Mill.

  • Man About Town has hit the nail on the head with this one.

  • I''ll believe it when I see it.............let''s just hope that city council isn''t getting played for suckers like they were with the Northern Breweries fiasco.

  • To me, Sudbury isn''t Sudbury without those towers. I wonder if anyone has pictures of those towers being erected by chance? Now that the Pine Street watertower looks like crap, and the one on Pearl Street is getting up there in age... All I can foresee, unfortunately, is predict them that they''ll be in pieces in some salvage yard down south....

  • All the eyesore folks are coming out of the woodwork. These same types are the ones that have continually robbed us, and our children, of our past. Landmarks are torn down in the name of progress, only years later to be regretted. Progress had the historical Post Office with it''s majestic clock tower razed. The Art Deco inspired TD bank on Durham is gone. The kitschy Empress Restaurant, the Capital Theatre, and not to mention dozens of historical restaurants and stores downtown. All gone. We have very few people that can recall the streetcars and roundhouse that was at the end of Notre Dame. Anybody remember the original race track that was next to the hills, west of Adanac Ski hill? Eyesores to a very few are actually history and heritage to others. Remember that the Hollywood(land) sign in Los Angeles was once deemed to be an eyesore. It faced the wrecking ball also.

  • We are seeing politics played perfectly here. A slick sales pitch that had land re-zoned in 2006 is about to be changed again. Notice how a "tourist attraction" and restaurant is on the back burner. The true project, residential development is now coming forth. This piece of prime real estate will slowly slip into apartments and condos. Once the usage is changed and the property deed already signed, it''ll be too late to preserve a Sudbury landmark. Mark my words, the tower will be deemed too expensive to change (or rotten) and it''ll be torn down and sold as scrap metal. Replaced with a high-end condo development. Do any of us honestly believe that counsel knows what it is doing? This is another Northern Breweries part deux. Remember, the owner of that property has gutted the stainless steel interior for scrap and run off with the goods as well. Nicely done. -- - - - again.

  • Sorry Mary...it is an eyesore. The sooner they move on this, the better. I have heard so many people from out of town call it ugly. It''s time has come!

  • What about the water tower in the west end , off Pine Street? This tower is one hell of an eye sore. I read recently that the Council had defered any talks about this tower.. They will keep defering any talks because they do not want to address the Issue... Before any committments are made regarding the Tower on Pearle , should not some decisions be at least discussed about the Pine Street water Tower? It is the one that is a visual scab on the skyline...If the tower on Pearle is considered a rusting hulk,, then how would the Pine Street tower be described? A scaborous victim of leprosy?

  • I hope the city does not find a way to screw this up. This can only add dollars and tourism to the city instead of costing taxpayers money to take it down.

  • The Sudbury water tower is not an eyesore, It is a Sudbury landmark.

FacebookTwitterRSSVideophotoNewsletterMobile