Home > Sudbury News

Xstrata says demand collapsing, 686 jobs lost

Thayer-Lindsley mine. Photo by Marg Seregelyi.

Thayer-Lindsley mine. Photo by Marg Seregelyi.

When the money was flowing and Sudbury was booming, everyone in our area was getting a chunk of the Nickel bonus in one way or another. For those of you that have written in over...

Posted by: hardhit

Read All Comments

Article Tools

Feb 09, 2009

By:

Posted by Northern Life Reporter Bill Bradley

The global economic meltdown is taking its toll on Greater Sudbury.

Gone are 686 full-time jobs at Xstrata Nickel, after the company recently announced a major restructuring of its Sudbury operations.

"Demand for our product has collapsed," said Marc Boissonneault, vice-president Xstrata Nickel, Sudbury on CBC Radio One, Monday morning.

"We can't carry on business as usual."

"Our leadership team is taking proactive and decisive measures during challenging
times," said Ian Pearce, Xstrata Nickel chief executive.

"The continued decline of the economic environment and deteriorating commodity markets, coupled with high operating costs, particularly at our older mines, are negatively impacting our Sudbury operations."

Two unions are affected. Mine Mill and Smelter Local 598/CAW will lose 50 per cent of its members, 578 positions, while the Steelworkers office and technical will lose 20 per cent of its bargaining unit, 40 employees, said Peter Fuchs, corporate affairs for Xstrata. Another 68 staff positions were cut, he said.

As a result of the Xstrata announcement, the following will occur:
- 686 permanent employee positions will be made redundant, affecting both union (600) and salaried (86) employees;
- three-day shutdown will take place immediately to implement restructuring and talk to employees;
- 300 employees will be moved to the higher-value Nickel Rim project, displacing some contractors;
- Fraser Mine will be placed on care and maintenance for now;
- accelerated closure of Craig and Thayer-Lindsley operations;
- Strathcona Mill will be reduced from four shifts to two;
- Fraser Morgan development project will be deferred to be evaluated and possibly re-initiated.

Richard Paquin, unit chair for the union, said he was shocked development work at Fraser Morgan was deferred.

"This is a lot more severe than we anticipated," said Paquin.

But Fuchs said Fraser Morgan was a higher cost operation than Nickel Rim South.

"Its viability is not good in these market conditions," he said.

There is also little chance of recall for laid off workers, added Paquin.

"The company's new vision is (to use) the manpower they have."

Last week newly-appointed Mine Mill and Smelter union president, Dwight Harper, said the company was marshaling all its resources for its new development projects like Nickel Rim South.

According to a recent company press release, the project remains on schedule to ramp up to 60 per cent of its ultimate 1.25-million tonne per annum production capacity in 2009, equivalent to approximately 7,400 tonnes of nickel.

"Nickel Rim South will become a low-cost, cornerstone operation in Sudbury, generating annual production of approximately 18,000 tonnes of recoverable nickel by early 2010," the release continued.

The company has invested $627 million for the project's first phase, which came in on time, and on budget. The remaining $300 million for the completion of mine development and infrastructure has been approved.

Boissonneault said the early retirement package offered to employees, and accepted by 216 of them, helped avert even more layoffs.

He said in a CBC Radio One interview that there would not be another early retirement offer given at this time.

"We gave a very generous package. There was a high acceptance rate. We have done as much as we can," he said.

Union layoffs were governed by the collective agreement and staff cuts were decided upon by the skill levels and transferability of individuals affected. Paquin said his colleagues were reviewing the layoffs for compliance with the agreement.

The Xstrata restructuring announcement is not all bad, said Jean-Charles Cachon, Laurentian University professor in the School of Commerce.

The companies are still profitable but having more trouble selling their products, especially for stainless steel, he said.

"The companies told us that their production costs were in the $2.80 to $3.00 range so they are still making money when nickel is in the $5 per pound range. If world demand had kept up, they might have extended the period of operation for their older mines or made plans to start them up again."

Both companies are still using their smelters for ores from their other operations, he noted.

Cachon said the impact of the job loss is still mostly psychological at this point.

"The economic multiplier for mining job loss affecting other jobs is overrated. I estimate it at 1.6. Strong demand will come back. The depth of the economic crisis has been larger than expected."

But Dick DeStefano, executive director of the mining supply and service cluster association, said the city will be hit by the loss of the Xstrata payroll loss. He also noted that with fewer mines to service, his members will be affected.

"Over the next few weeks we will determine the impact. There will be a drop in business for them. Our members did not expect this to be so dramatic."

Cachon did say the city's future was bright because it was the hub of the north. Vacancy rates are still very low and continuing to drop. People who are laid off still have severance packages and employment insurance, he added.

"They are not left without any money. I don't see a strong impact from this announcement." He said, for example, the much touted drop in enrollment at his university was nonsense.

"Six years ago we had 4,500 students. Now we have dropped from 8,500 to 8,100. We are still ahead. If you look at the growth of this city recently then we are still strong compared to the past."

Northern Life's sister publication, Northern Ontario Business, also has a story on this subject. Click here to read the story.

Bookmark and Share

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments or postings to myNews. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

30 Comments

  • When the money was flowing and Sudbury was booming, everyone in our area was getting a chunk of the Nickel bonus in one way or another. For those of you that have written in over the months saying how great it would be to pick up a cheap quad, boat, or house...How do you get out of bed in the morning and look at yourself in the mirror?? It must be a pretty ugly site! If every miner saved every penny they ever made, Sudbury would not have created the amount of jobs they have over the past. So whether or not you were the person buying or the one selling...It will affect this community! So instead of trying to make yourself sound like a funny man,(cause that aint working for y!) stop and think how it will impact someone you know...mother, father, sister, brother, cousins, aunts, uncles, neighbours or friends (if you have any). And yes (because I know you are wondering) my husband is in the mining industry...and yes we are fearful of what is coming down the line, but it would be a cold day in hell that I would get self gratification of wishing harder times on anyone else! Oh and just to let you know...No, we have not purchased anything that "you might get a good deal on"!

  • I''ll say it again,,,, Sudbury is a great place to be FROM!!!

  • I''ve just recently read a study regarding underground truck haulage in Australian mines. Could someone in the union here explain to me why average seat time for a 12hour shilt is 10 hours in Australia and here its 7 hours. They have hot changes there, the trucks stop for 30 seconds change drivers and move on, during lunch hour you eat your lunch, and truck keeps going, then you come back after 30min (what a concept) and get back into your truck. Our workers have to get more competitive.

  • "The global economic meltdown is taking its toll on Greater Sudbury." Suprised? glad to know that chicken little is alive and well in Sudbury.

  • There appears to be much discussion on the three year job guarantee. Today would be quite close to that third anniversary and I am not certain exactly when the promise was made. However as this News Release dated June 1, 2006 will point out it must be very close if not already passed. News Release: Xstrata plc C$52.50 All Cash Offer for Falconbridge remains best choice for Shareholders Toronto and Zug, 1 June 2006 Xstrata plc (““Xstrata””) has noted the announcement by the Falconbridge board of directors expressing their continued support for the Inco bid to acquire Falconbridge (““the Inco offer””). Xstrata re-affirms its belief that its C$52.50 all cash offer for Falconbridge shares (““the Xstrata offer””) is the best choice for Falconbridge shareholders, the company, community, and employees. The Inco share price has risen by 11 per cent since May 5th, the day on which Teck announced their premium offer for Inco. During the same period and despite continued buoyant metal prices, the S&P mining index has declined by 11 per cent. By any objective measure, even taking into account the takeover premium currently embedded in the Inco share price, Xstrata’’s all cash offer of C$52.50 remains a superior offer to that of Inco. Mick Davis, Xstrata Chief Executive, said: ““Xstrata is offering Falconbridge shareholders a higher price in cash for their shares and we believe this clearly makes our bid the best choice for shareholders. Our offer is also the best choice for Falconbridge employees, particularly in light of Inco’’s recent agreement with the Steelworkers’’ Union to protect Inco employees at Sudbury from lay-offs for three years, including following a take-over of Inco by any third party. We stand by our commitment to Falconbridge employees to make no lay-offs at Sudbury for a minimum of three years.”” You can access the entire News Release here:

  • I am feeling for all these workers but I would also like to point out that it''s not just the mining industry that''s been hit.....I got laid off 2 weeks ago along with many others.....chin up people....especially if you have your health!

  • I fell bad for those that are affected by this. However, it should not come as a surprise. The writing was on the wall when metal prices began to plunge in Sept. The warning bells had to be going off with the First Nickel and FNX layoffs. Anybody working in the mining industry in town should have been able to see that there was a rough road ahead and to begin to prepare themselves for the storm coming. But unfortunately there are some out there who are oblivious or just plain don''t care. I can''t speak for Xstrata employees but I would think workers at INCO would be smart right now and be making every effort they could to try and reduce our cost per pound so that we might be able to avoid this. But nope, instead I see lots of sitting around grumbling about overtime cuts. Not much overtime on EI. This storm is not over yet. People need to prepare themselves financially for a rough road if your tied into the mining sector. And employees in the mining sector should be looking for whatever ways to reduce costs they can. Because this time it''s not about lining some shareholders pockets. It''s about reducing costs to keep the job that lines your own pockets.

  • I understand changing business conditions lead to difficult decisions including layoffs. But THESE layoffs are being made in blunt violation of an iron-clad 3 year guarantee made by Xstrata and carefully considered by Xstrata PRIOR to buying Falconbridge. If they were not prepared to honour that guarantee, they should not have made it. And they should not have been allowed to buy Falconbridge. At this point the relevant government body should immediately propose a bill to unilaterally revoke all Xstrata mineral rights to Canadian ore until the terminated staff are rehired for the full term of the 3 years. If mineral rights revokation is a violation of an existing agreement, so what? Xstrata will not honour their guarantees to this community and we ought not to honour ours to them.

  • I would also like to add...its more than 686 employees. Think of all the contractors that lost their jobs (FNX and Cementation) and the other couple hundred who took early retirement packages...and its only a matter of time bere vale inco does something similar.

  • From the letter my husband was sent home with....this is PERMANENT and that there are no chances of call backs. Ya sure they did offer a severence package...an equivalent of a few months wages (without any bonuses from working). As for EI, you can only collect that for a limited amount of time and the amount they give you is very little compared to what these employees were making actually working. Sure, people say they can get another job. Thats a fair judgement, except 686 people are now all looking for the same jobs...how is that going to work? So for those of you who think that this will be ok, and that its not that bad...think again. EVERYONE will be affected by this.

  • This Swiss company made a commitment to the Canadian goverment.No layoffs for 3 years.Who the hell gave Tory apologist Tony Clement the right to abrogate such an agreement?The goverment sold out Sudbury when it allowed the sale of both Inco&Falconbridge to overseas Pirates who pillage our mineral resources when prices are high and then dump us when times get tough!!!I feel very sorry for the young men and women at both companies who must be going through hell right now!

  • Vale''s announcement will be any day. They are looking at about 400 layoffs. I don''t think any mgmt. though. It is just a matter of time before reality sinks in that this is for real. Vale''s mgmgt. is being very low key about layoffs as they want to keep all mgmt. positions and only layoff actual workers.

  • Vale Inco is next. It doesn''t take a room full of rocket sciences to have seen this coming. As soon as base metal demand and prices rocketed, all the pirtates from all over the world, swarmed to Sudbury, Ontario. After 3-4 years of plundering and empire building, the money runs out and so will the pirates, and then there will be a lot of new and empty offices available.

  • Reading over the press release and Dwight Harper''s interview, it appears that the lay off was not driven by the economic (d) recession. With no recall rights to 700 people, this was a permanent deep cut. Sudbury is reeling. In JR’s interview he states “during times like this, a community has to branch out”. He just doesn’t get it does he?

  • Not living in Sudbury myself, but having tried to study up on it over the past year seeing that I''m thinking of moving there, I''m kind of in a quandary about the lack of economic diversity in Sudbury. On the one hand, the residents seem to always be opposed to large scale projects that could potentially draw in the kind of people and businesses that could more fully develop the economy (because they''re expensive and rely heavily on the tax payer due to the precious little the mining industry pays in taxes), and on the other hand, in the time that I''ve been watching, the projects proposed by the government there seem, at least to me, less than visionary. I''m really not sure who to blame or even if it''s 50/50. I just visited there in December expecting to fall in love with it immediately because I love so much about the place, but the lack of any coherence to the city, the utter scattershot of development made it totally confusing to me, and quite a bit of a turnoff. I''m still considering it, and I know that a lot of the problems I see are due to the relatively recent amalgamation, but I think it''s been long enough for the city to start getting its act together but it doesn''t seem to be. Btw, my condolences to those effected by the "restructuring". I''ve never been in that kind of position but I''d imagine that I''d be stuck somewhere between rage and crying, and I don''t have a family. I hope that most people are in a position to weather the storm.

  • Once a mining rural outpost, always a mining rural outpost. Sudbury cannot avoid these lows in all mining activity cycles. Although it was expected, its severity and quick arrival caught us somewhat by surprise.

  • inco won''t layoff. they would have to pay severance. now why would they do that when they could just wait for a couple months and force a strike, and then not have to pay anything?

  • sadburian...and everyone else too, ''cause i know everyone''s thinking it... "and give it less than 1 month before ValeInco does the same..." I was just asking my dad about that today (being a 28 year employee of INCO and in charge of some major purchasing) and we was quick to reassure me that INCO is actually in a better state than Xtrata. From what i''ve heard..INCO is going to be doing huge spending throughout the year and getting some major work done.. He also told me about how 3 weeks ago they even hired a couple millwrights. I also know another employee that hasn''t been there all that long who told me today that they had meetings not long ago and were promised their jobs are secure. Now keep in mind that this is what i''ve HEARD over the day today......knowing my luck...inco''s going to turn around and make me stick my foot in my mouth.

  • Sad day for Sudbury. What will Vale have to offer everyone in the months ahead?? What will they move out of Sudbury and back to Brazil?? Taxes increasing,water rates increasing. I wonder if the two big projects are the main priorities of these people and other families now?

  • It is high time for some accountability on both the government and Xstrata''s part. It was the federal government that approved the takeover and in doing so they accepted the moral, ethical and monetary responsibility for the future economy of this community. The primary reason that Xstrata cited in order to gain the government''s approval was their commitment to ongoing employment in this community stating "no layoffs or job losses for at least 3 years". It is time for us to stand up and fight for our collective rights. Call your MP now and start emailing/faxing EVERYONE on Parliament Hill. If we accept what has been handed down today without even so much as a discussion then we will have no alternative but to be responsible for our own fate.

  • At least they have all that nickel bonus money socked away (I wonder what percent actually saved some or all of it - I''d guess less than 15percent). That money will help them through this little rough spell until they can get back to work. I''m looking to buy a nice used quad also looking to move up to a bigger house. If anyone wants to sell let me know.

  • Being one of these families affected, it is nice to see that some people realize the impact that it is going to have. Man About Town said it right when he said that it does not just affect 686 people, it affects thier familes as well. My heart goes out to the rest of those that are in disbelief as we are today. I wish I could say hope for better days but I truly know how hard that is right now.

  • http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN0951291020090209 OTTAWA, Feb 9 (Reuters) - Facing pressure from Canada''s government, miner Xstrata Plc (XTA.L) has agreed to make hundreds of millions of dollars of new investment in the Sudbury nickel district after cutting mining activity and jobs in the area, Canadian Industry Minister Tony Clement said on Monday. Speaking to reporters, Clement said the agreement followed discussions over whether Xstrata had violated the terms of a deal signed when it took over Sudbury nickel miner Falconbridge in late 2006. "As a result of those discussions, additional undertakings were agreed to by Xstrata to the government of Canada, including a firm commitment for an additional investment in the mines there," Clement said. Earlier, the company said it would slow or stop some of its Sudbury operations and cut 686 permanent jobs after a collapse in metals prices, particularly nickel. (Reporting by Randall Palmer, writing by Cameron French; editing by Rob Wilson)

  • Just lost my job at xstrata, along with countless others, some with as high as 10 years in, i left a good paying job for what I was told was a lifelong career. When I called today to ask if I could retrieve my tools from underground when i go in for my "MEETING" layoff, firing or whatever you want to call it, I was told no and the company will be getting my tools out by the end of the week. Likely story. What is a mechanic supposed to do to support his family without his tools of the trade. Come hell or high water tomorrow I will be tagging in, going underground and retrieving the thousands of dollars in tools that belong to me. I was told by the Xstrata representative on the phone that he understands my situation, I am without my job or tools, yet he is still employed. Tomorrow my tools and myself will bid farewell to Xstrata but the sour taste in my mouth will linger for a long time to come. To all my Brothers at local 598 dont forget about the nickel bonus they robbed us of for the 3d quarter, dont forget about the 3 year no layoff they signed when buying the company. And when the sherif comes to take you from your home because you cant pay the mortgage , remember there''s no one to buy it from the bank. Squat as long as u can and dont go without a fight.

  • Welcome to Sadbury, where the leaders are proud to lead a one horse town down the wrong path. They give themselves a pay raise and turn away investors. Well many passengers will be getting off this bus, destination.... unknown.

  • MAT I agree, and give it less than 1 month before ValeInco does the same... My thoughts go out to Xstrata families.

  • Layoff''s? These are not layoff''s from what I''m reading in this article and others. This looks like it''s out right terminations as the positions are redundant.

  • 686 families affected. 686 homes. Average 3-4 people per household and that''s nearly 2,000 people. This is just a drip in the bucket. Because with the reduced production, comes the reduction in support and supply companies. Expand this to effect even more people in the long run. The cascade effect will hit right down to the housing market and retail sales. So, where did the diversity plan go? Why did our elected officials and city leaders do nothing over the last decade to avoid this? They sat and raked in absurd property taxes and wasted opportunities. Not one good paying industry courted. Not one. Strap yourselves in folks. This will be remembered as the first shoe to drop.

  • ouch. My best hopes for the families of those who have been laid off. I was going to write my best hopes for all those affected by the lay off - but I think that includes everyone in Sudbury. Get ready for expedited brain drain, population emigration, and empty store fronts.

  • Another blow to the monolithic mining economy of Sudbury.