Vale Inco strike — the sounds of silence

Jan 20, 2010- 3:25 PM

By: Sudbury Northern Life Staff

Someone said the other day the strike at Vale Inco might go for another two years. Sounds ridiculous. On the other hand, it is the same source who said last summer the strike would last until spring, which sounded fanciful, but is looking more realistic all the time. The theory is not complicated. The belief is the London Metal Exchange is no longer the true predictor and authority on inventory and the price of nickel. The idea is that the real price of nickel is well below the current seven or eight dollars a pound and that private warehouses around the world are full of nickel and therefore the real lost opportunity for Vale Inco is not that much.

For Vale, on top of the insignificance of the nickel business to their overall enterprise, it is the relatively modest return they will get if they go back to work that is at issue.

This, of course, could be utter nonsense. We may never know.

What is clear at this stage is the company has no interest in sitting down with the union to find common ground. They will not sit down until the union has cried “Uncle” and this is hard to do in the churning political democracy of a union.

Things need to be a little more nuanced.

When you want an agreement with someone, the most important person in the room is the person on the other side of the table. You look after them. You provide political cover. You treat them with some deference and respect. The reason of course is that your objective is to reach an agreement, not exact revenge or teach lessons.

It is impossible to read the company. It is foreign-owned. No Canadian has any meaningful authority. Their game plan, whatever it is, will be revealed when they are ready. For the moment they are probably trying to figure how many people it actually takes to run their business by starting up without the strikers.

The union has blundered into this situation and has little leverage. Only the ridiculous politics of holding local union elections close to the end of a contract can explain such strange behaviour.

The union has underestimated the company’s resolve. This is understandable. Vale Inco settled in Manitoba not that long ago for more than they are prepared to offer in Ontario. This is confusing in any process of gamesmanship.

The union’s strategy of challenging Vale around the world is misguided. It dissipates strength and focus at home, inflames the egos of the senior executives of Vale, and makes it personal. It sets Sudbury workers up as guinea pigs for an international test of wills and reminds the company every day that the cost of labour in Sudbury is one thing, but if it has impact around the world, it could be expensive. It is a losing strategy and should be dropped immediately. It raises the ante for the company and likely makes them irrationally intransigent. The losers are Sudbury workers.

Ontarians are suckers. The provincial government, which owns the natural resources, has all the leverage in the world, if they chose to use it, but has neither the interest nor the guts to deal themselves in. They should be knocking heads, and they are playing foozball. They have nothing to say, nothing to recommend, nary a pulse. This is not new in the world of resource management for these people. They just allowed a smelter in Timmins to close (the first economic crime since the amusing launch of the Northern Growth Plan) because of high electricity costs. They just don’t think there is anything they can do. It is a disease. Perhaps sell some shares in General Motors, but I digress.

The Canadian government isn’t so gutless. They have made it clear they think Sudbury is better served by foreign owners and they have no obligation to release the agreements they have entered into with Vale Inco unless Vale Inco tells them it is OK. They take their “talking points” from the Brazilians.

The two main issues in this strike are important to Sudburians, although there is little indication they understand it. The pensions negotiated by the union helped Sudbury survive the massive layoffs of the 1980s. We have more pensioners than active Steelworkers. The nickel bonus, whatever it merits, is the only value Sudburians get from the resources under our feet. The nickel bonus creates jobs in Sudbury. The rest of the booty goes elsewhere.

It appears the only end to this strike will come from government action. Either the Brazilian government will tire of being tarred with the politics of its proxy in Canada, the federal government will wake up and take as much interest in Vale Inco as it has in U.S. Steel (Stelco) in Hamilton, or the provincial government will remember the resources of this province are a public trust and they are the trustees.

In the meantime, the rest of us suffer the ineptitude of the union and the smugness of a company with other fish to fry and no local history.

Michael Atkins is president of Northern Life.

Read More: Home > Columns > Michael Atkins

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

19 Comments

  • Good article! There's enough bad on both sides of the main bargaining table that it hardly matters anymore. Canadians as a whole need to look to our blundering politicians that waste more time and capital trying to play a part in the world stage, when they clearly cannot even take care of business at home.

    This inaction on the strike by them is only more proof of their inability in this area. Canada as it stands is a resource based country and we are giving it away almost freely to the world for the sake of work for Canadians. Now in this case the company is backing out on that as well.

    You would think that would open up the eyes of the politicians in question, but I guess they are looking at the big world picture instead. I wonder what they have to gain by doing that? What do Canadians have to gain from it?

    That's a question we're not likely to hear an honest answer on. Just more smoke and mirrors from our politicians.

  • inco workers hardly make that much money in the first place, they are not spoiled bums, they are set back years every time there is a a strike. this City came together for falconbridge in 2000 when we had our big strike, what makes inco any different, all these guys want is transfer rights, a good pension after years of breathing nickel dust, and the respect they deserve, dont be fooled folks this is an attack on the canadian way of life, and weather you are a jealous of inco workers or not, it affects us all.

  • The wealth of a nation isnt determined by PPP, or Nominal GDP, the unit of measurement is either the country's GNI (canada 0.966, Brasil 0.883) or the GDP per person. (canada 39 668$ per capita, Brazil 8 600$ per capita) Brazil is incomparable to canada's level of development, if you are going to post something on a comment board, make sure you arent talking out of your ass.

  • If you are not an INCO employee then no one really cares what you think, you are not on the payroll so your opinion doesn't mean anything, go write about the bingo strike in Toronto, thats just as useful as you are to Sudbury

  • What is point of having an opinion if you will not leave my comment on, Inco workers are spoiled bums

  • Hey @sudburydave,

    I never said that Brazil was top ranked in the world, I merely said it wasn't a third world country. To be even clearer, the term "Third World" isn't even used anymore because it was a reference make back during the cold war where 1st World was referring to democratic countries, 2nd world referring to Communist countries and 3rd world being neither/nor.

    Whether it is ranked 4th, 10th, or 75th doesn't matter. The fact of the matter is, is that it is considered a "Developed Nation" and not a "Under-developed" nation (3rd world).

  • hey casual_observer I take back about you being right about brazil being a 3rd world country , on a chart I looked at reguarding " Human Development " Canada ranked 4th and your beloved brazil ranked 75th , lol . you being a reporter should maybe do some homework of your own ,lol .

  • you're right casual , I should of said " Thrid World Company "

  • @sudburydave - You should really do some research before you calling Brazil 3rd world country. You can have an opinion but at least base it on fact.

    Here is a link that lists countries by their GDP. Brazil is higher then Canada on all three charts.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28nominal%29

  • If there were an anti-scab law here in ontario or anypart of this country , what's going on in this city would not be happening . 9 miners were killed in yellowknife for scabbing that picketline in 92 , when jobs are stolen and that is what scabbing is , people get desperate and things will get out of control , I've seen it happen . this company doesn't give a dam about any of us and things are going to get ugly . how come these aliens from a 3rd world are aloud to destroy our community , where the hell is our goverment

  • Mike, you are correct that Vale does not trade on the LME, they sell directly to their buyers via purcase agreements, the production layoff in June was a direct result of these contracts being cancelled and having far too much nickel, I think the strike followed in the hope that market conditions would improve and they have not. Being such a large company Vale can hold off untill things improve at the expence of the workers and surrounding economy.

  • "That's total BS. The actual FACT is governments have NO right in dictating or interfering in the lawful operation of any company. Be it nickel or widget production. This is just pure sensationalist tripe. Trying to wrap the strike in the Canadian flag."

    Rubbish. Governments "dictate and interfere in the lawful operation of companies" all of the time; it's called legislative authority. This right allows them to establish rules in, say, the Labour Relations Act, as well as the authority to amend those rules.

  • The strike can go as long as it wants to, but the company knows that they're saving money right now and the nickel is still in the ground. The only losers here are the union members, they can't afford to wait, I'm pretty sure they need their wages to survive day to day. It's quite unfortunate that the union has absolutely no leverage in today's market, certainly a bad play on the union's part having not known the circumstances before going into the strike.

  • Best article I've read about the strike in the past six months in the local media. Bravo.

  • The Honorable Danny Williams Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador fought for his constituents tooth and nail. When big oil came to his province and wanted to dictate a deal for their oil, he flat out told them NO, these resources belong to Newfoundland and Labrador, and if you want them you must negotiate a fair deal. They laughed at him and left. But their oil was still theirs, 17 months later big oil came back to the table with a different mindset, and they negotiated a FAIR DEAL for all parties involved. So sometimes the little guy can win, but only if our elected representatives have the balls and aren't afraid to fight for what’s right. Both sides won that day.

  • Excellent article Mr Atkins. I believe t is very much accurate in the description of the dilemma our communities are facing. Strangely enough there are still Vale bloggers inappropriately sticking their false innuendos and hoping to spew their deceptions upon any unaware or uninformed fellow citizens. So, hats off to you and thank you for describing this very unfortunate circumstances to the general public quite clearly.

  • Nortel was sold? Falconbridge twice?
    The strike is over. The union/socialist experiment failed. Your view is shared by the union and obviously is the incorrect one.
    The men and women about to lose their homes need to rethink the old union ways.

  • Sorry Mike, you got this entire thing backwards.
    Step back from the socialist, pro-union tilt.

    It is 6500 that refuses to sit down. They are on the record as saying, "No concessions means NO CONCESSIONS".

    "What is clear at this stage is the UNION has no interest in sitting down with the company to find common ground. They will not sit down until the company has cried “Uncle”.

    "It is impossible to read the union. It is foreign-run."
    The USWAmerica is being lead by Leo Gerard in Pittsburgh. Trying to make global solidarity with other Steelworkers. He envisioned Sudbury as the jewel in the crown.

    "The union’s strategy of challenging Vale around the world is misguided." - Ya got that right!

    "Ontarians are suckers. The provincial government, which owns the natural resources, has all the leverage in the world, if they chose to use it, but has neither the interest nor the guts to deal themselves in."
    That's total BS. The actual FACT is governments have NO right in dictating or interfering in the lawful operation of any company. Be it nickel or widget production. This is just pure sensationalist tripe. Trying to wrap the strike in the Canadian flag.
    "The Canadian government isn’t so gutless. They have made it clear they think Sudbury is better served by foreign owners" - Same BS. And nary a word about how the American union is running the labour force? - How about how Honda, Nissan, and Toyota are doing in Ontario?


    "In the meantime, the rest of us suffer the ineptitude of the union and the smugness of a company with other fish to fry and no local history."
    Backwards AGAIN. It's the ego of the union and it's inability to understand the economy. Their greed is what's driving the strike. Nothing else. Regardless who owns the deed of Inco, we see all nickel mining operations are scaling back. Using Brazil as an excuse is convenient nationalism. Where were you Mike when Nor

  • Please take the time to research exactly what occurred in Red Lake ON with respect to the work stoppage at Goldcorps .It will take your breath away . Justaskin

FacebookTwitterRSSVideophotoNewsletterMobile