Sudbury needs a changed John Rodriguez

Oct 20, 2010- 4:01 PM

By: Wendy Bird - Sudbury Northern Life Staff

We are living in a time when effective communications have taken a nosedive. In our quest to get more information — authentic information — faster, we embrace e-mail, Internet searches, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and more. We receive snippets and sound bites of reports, surveys and opinions, and we receive them in spades. But does it help us make more informed decisions?

The race for mayor in the 2010 Greater Sudbury municipal election has been filled with press releases, videos, tweets and public forums literally pepper-sprayed on the voting public — sometimes with the same blinding result.
Where is the context?

Ward 8 councillor and budget chair Ted Callaghan continues to provide the public with a credible view on city operations from a financial standpoint. His message is clear: things aren’t going to get any better for the city, unless we look for cost efficiencies and tighten our collective belts. For Callaghan, this is essential if we are to attend to the voters’ top of mind issues of infrastructure and contained taxes.

Greater Sudburians want change in leadership. But does incumbent mayor John Rodriguez really grasp that concept?

Political neophyte Marianne Matichuk brings a refreshing viewpoint on Greater Sudbury operations as a former city health and safety officer and a supervisor at Pioneer Manor. She has rattled some cages in the city, brought up some contentious issues and seems determined to put into effect her campaign slogan of “Real Change Now.”
And don’t we all want that?

Candidate Derek Young seems to want that, too, and has taken on the challenge of bringing grassroots issues to the forefront. The youthful arts and non-profit sector worker has spent time immersing himself in various pockets of our community, gathering stories of discontent, which he shares through his Facebook, YouTube and Twitter accounts. His efforts are admirable, but he doesn’t have the momentum to crack the top three candidates.

Greater Sudburians want change in leadership. But does incumbent mayor John Rodriguez really grasp that concept? Clearly, he is the candidate with the most experience — one who has survived one political landmine after another. Has he learned from those mistakes?

Many dissatisfied voters offer up a resounding “No,” and point to the fiasco of the Elton John ticket sales, the “lost” St. Joseph’s hospital site and Rodriguez’s failed bid to bring forth a Performing Arts Centre and a Muti-Use Recreational Facility. Some of our readers have said Rodriguez failed to provide effective leadership during the year-long strike at Vale.

Staff and city workers grumble, off the record, about the lack of efficiencies, duplication and waste that is ongoing throughout Greater Sudbury operations. Rodriguez appears to recognize this discontent and points to the hiring of an auditor during his term to examine the various departments “line-by-line.” Not surprisingly, for an incumbent, he chooses to focus on what is working and, perhaps, blocks out some valuable feedback in the process. He is not a fan of criticism.

Recently, Matichuk brought forth a 2009 report done by a local research firm that indicates the mayor is “detached” from city staff and managers. She said the report also noted that the mayor should “make greater efforts to listen to workers.”

The entire report is an interesting read, but one of the most interesting parts was the methodology and resulting participation rate. In compiling research, a total of 140 invitations were sent to employees and 52 agreed to participate. A total of 88 employees refused to participate. In the end, a further 14 of the 52 recruited did not show for their scheduled session.

Good communication is a two-way street. And in some cases, as in the demanding job of mayor, communication can be as complex as a Persian carpet. It is troubling that, when given the opportunity to have their say, people easily give up the chance.

Matichuk has come out swinging and has been driven by a supportive team of people who are determined to see change at the city. She has a vision to clean up city hall, but, when asked off-the-cuff to provide meaningful content behind these plans, she falls short on the details. She cannot run this city on a slogan. Her campaign has relied on finger pointing at city operations — a disingenuous approach that has left people wondering how she can expect to meaningfully connect with city workers and administration.

Callaghan can provide relative context in a gentlemanly manner, which makes him a solid mayoral candidate. That said, he has been underwhelming and, during debates held so far, comes across as an uninspiring leader.

Our city is at a crossroads. Frankly, it almost always is. Whether it’s a strike, the sale of our local mining companies, a plunge or rise in commodity prices, or the constant challenge to manage a big geographic city with limited population, it is never business as usual.

For us, the question is not just cutting expenses, it is creating taxpayers to share the load.

What we need is a changed John Rodriguez. He is a skilled orator but words are cheap. He needs to respect the taxpayers of this region with a rigorous transformation on cost control measures and priority, he needs to find humility and listen to his opponents as well as his supporters, he needs new people and new ideas to relentlessly pursue a sustainable economic plan for Sudbury and, most importantly, as the most senior municipal politician in this community, he needs to help prepare a new generation of Sudburians to lead this community by the time our next election rolls around.

Send your comments to editor@northernlife.ca. 

Read More: Home > Columns > Wendy Bird

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

8 Comments

  • Dear Editor,

    I just read the article by Wendy Bird regarding the upcoming elections for Mayor. I found the article very well written and very insightful.

    Many goods points made about the 3 major candidates and the issues at hand. I have been involved in politics, sat on local council and actually ran for Mayor a few years back. I also take a special interest in watching people, especially when it comes to politics. One thing that I have learned and watched many times, is that it is much easier to criticize than it is to get things done! And the more one tries to accomplish, no matter how successful they may be, the more criticism they will get.

    Ted Callahan seems to be a pretty honest guy, he has experience, and he knows the realities. Things are tough at city hall, money is tight, he is not making promises he knows he cannot keep. You cannot fix everything in one day! I have to respect his experience and the fact that he is running for Mayor.

    Marianne Matichuck is what I see as one of those who likes to talk loud, criticize a lot, and state that she will fix everything that is wrong at city hall! Good Luck! We have seen many politicians with good intentions, realize very quickly, that changing systems and people, like city hall, is very difficult. Mike Harris promised change, and he actually did it, and then people hated him, even though he did what he said he was going to do. Marianne has no idea how difficult it is dealing with unions, they do not accept change, especially if it is some kind of a cut back. I don’t think she understands how intricate things can be dealing with municipal, provincial and federal issues, as they affect the city, and relative funding. It is one thing to promise “Real Change”, it is more difficult identifying what this change is and how it will be done. I agree with your article, she seems to be a bit short on detail. If it was that easy, it would be done by now. ...continued....

  • ...continued

    John Rodriguez is a career politician. He has experience dealing with all levels of government, he is politically correct, and as a fault he is a visionary. When John was elected as mayor he had some big projects that he wanted to get started, specifically in the arts and recreation fields. Yes his ideas might have been grand, but at least he had ideas and had the drive and enthusiasm to bring them forward. And of course when you try and do something, especially something big, open the flood gates for those who live to criticize! Regarding the Elton John ticket affair, I can’t believe we are still talking about that, I think we have more important things to worry about. And the St. Joseph’s Hospital, so called loss to the city, if people looked at the numbers, economically the city taxpayers would have paid millions just to knock that building down and remove the debris. That would have provided a great opportunity to criticize!

    It is nice to see different people running for office, and in doing so create these types of debates. That is what democracy is all about. But in voting, and definitely do get out and vote, be careful what you ask for? Personally I like people with a vision, people who work with others and get things done. People who care about others and are accountable for their actions. That is why I will be supporting John on Monday night.

    Frank Couture

  • I don't think the column is the source of confusion, rather the choices on the ballot on Monday is where the greatest confusion comes in. The column to me just seems to be a commentary on the difficult choice, someone who has no experience and difficulty off script vs. someone who is a great debater with tons of experience but how hasn't received a very good grade over the past mandate. Humility, repsect for the taxpayer and willing ears are the suggested hallmark of a good mayor and they don't appear to exist in any of the candidates. If that's an endorsement then I read it wrong.

  • What kind of endorsement is this? It smells odd. How do you endorse a "changed John Rodriguez" when it is not a changed John Rodriguez that's running for Mayor? The Rodriguez before us on the ballot is the Rodriguez we have and not a "changed" one. He is the one who still thinks there was nothing wrong with taking Elton John tickets, holding secret meetings, and misleading council over the sale of the St. Joe's property. That is the Rodriguez we have on the ballot. The guy who is a pro politician with no substance. I spoke with someone on the Matichuk campaign and they were confused by this column given that endorsements are usually given after an editorial board meeting happens with the candidate. That's what the Sudbury Star did. The Star editorials were tough on Matichuk until they sat down with her earlier this week, had an in-depth discussion with her and realized there was a lot of real substance there. They wound up endorsing her because they got to know her. That's how it works with real newspapers. The Northern Life didn't sit down with her. In fact, they hardly covered her from what I read. I can only make one observation. I have noticed the Matichuk campaign did a lot of advertising during the campaign on TV, many radio stations, and several newspapers. But, I notice there were no ads in the Northern Life - none at all. And, then this weird 'endorsement' for Rodriguez when recent polls show the vast majority of people want him gone. Interesting. Does the sales department tell the newsroom what to do?

  • John had his chance to be an effective Mayor but instead became an autocrat if only in his own mind.He had his kick at the cat and failed miserably and now it's time for a change.

  • What we need is for the political peopel to do things the right way the first time. End of discusion.

  • This column was accidentally posted to the Michael Atkins' column originally. It has since been corrected to display under the author Wendy Bird. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.

  • Funny that this was under Mr. Atkins name a few short minutes ago and now it is under Wendy's name. Interesting.

FacebookTwitterRSSVideophotoNewsletterMobile