Home > Columns

Former union boss finds it hard to trust Vale Inco - Dave Campbell

Another artical today about contoling cost and our aging infastructure and it's true but that's mining . Yes you have to reinvest and find cheaper and be more cost efficiant I won't argue that but...

Posted by: sudburydave

Read All Comments

Article Tools

Bookmark and Share
Feb 08, 2010

By: Sudbury Northern Life Staff

It is not hard to be concerned that Vale’s attack on its unionized employees will be followed up by an assault on retirees. By studying Vale and its current methods, there is no reason to think that Vale will not attempt to rape the retirement funds next. The easiest way for them to do this will be to remove or at least degrade the local union, which is the only watch dog to see that the obligations to our retirement funds are secure.

I would be very concerned that this group will find a way to take vacations from funding their obligations to our pensions and to attack the benefit package that we all assumed would be protected in our latter years. Do you trust our pensions to a company that lays off 17-year employees and moves their jobs to Brazil; a company that hires a security agency to follow people around taking pictures and recording their conversations; a company that brings in scab labour to run its plants?

Their idea of oversight seems to be: “here is what we are doing and if you don’t like it, drop dead.”

(Mike Sopko and Jim Ashcroft) were tough, right-wing company people who were difficult to deal with, but . . . at least they met you at the bargaining table.

Without a strong local union, we would have to rely on the federal Conservatives and the provincial Liberals to protect our retirement futures. We have seen what both of these parties think of the northern Ontario nickel industry. The Conservative party, as a whole, should be investigated as to why it allowed Vale access to our resources in the first place — and why other Canadian resources are being let go to off-shore interests. Sudbury MPP Rick Bartolucci was at a lot of the labour functions prior to his election and has been quoted as saying, “when we are in power, there will be no scabs crossing picket lines.”

He was out of the country when the scab legislation hit the floor. To me, Rick is probably the most disappointing figure in Ontario politics since Mike Harris. He did look pretty good dancing in the legislature when they passed the harmonized sales tax. We will see what tune he dances to in two years.

(I believe) the Brazilians — masquerading as businessmen — are out to destroy the fabric of Sudbury’s history in the mining industry, and will leave in its wake a destitute resource. While past Inco management protected the ore reserves by mixing high- and low-grade ore from all of the mine sites, these money guys will, in my opinion, go after high-grade sources, maximizing profits in the short term, while destroying Sudbury’s future in the long term.

I predict that only the high-grade mines will operate, that we could see an operation without a refinery, and if SO2 emissions become a problem, then the concentrate from the mills will be shipped to the highest bidder and the smelter will be shut down. It will be a company run by contractors, pack-sack miners, and temporary employees. It will be a company hell-bent on short-term profits, while robbing our children of a future that includes a vibrant nickel industry.

Those who condemn the union and support Vale’s position better get ready for fewer employees with money to shop in your stores. An unstructured, volatile workforce with unsure futures. These imported scabs, along with our home-grown ones, will pit Sudburian against Sudburian, a plan I am sure Vale hopes will work to their favour. This will equate to a higher accident rate, a higher traumatic injury rate and a higher accidental death rate, along with more crime on our streets. If you think that things will return to normal when this strike is over, you are wrong.

I believe in free enterprise. I believe in free collective bargaining. But there is nothing free about this. This is not a strike and is not a lock out. Both would infer a bargaining process and it is obvious there is none. This is an assault on our resources and our social structure. One hundred years of company and labour restructuring are being flushed down the toilet.

I doubt Vale’s agenda will ever change. Our only hope is that the 6500 membership stays strong, and that we place into power an MPP who will stand up for Sudbury. A minority voice speaking is better than a majority voice that says nothing. In the short term, let both levels of government know you are not happy.

Last but not least, don’t worry about the smoke coming out of the stack. The millions of dollars for Vale security, the overtime cost for staff working the plants, the three- and four-times cost for scabs and contractors to perform the work regular employees do, and the expense of this strike, will drive the cost per pound so high their accountants will go nuts. They will need well over the going rate to break even.

Things will start to break down and the cost of repair will skyrocket. Every pound produced will be sold at a loss and the money will be handed over to the security guards, the scabs, and the contractors.

When Jose Blanco, a past Inco vice president, oversaw the rebuilding of the smelter, he made it very clear the place is built to run flat-out. Curtailing production drives up costs and does not make good business sense.

These views and opinions are mine and, as a Vale retiree, and a past president of Local 6500, I felt I should voice my concern. Mike Sopko, Jim Ashcroft and the many mining type people are gone. They were tough, right-wing company people who were difficult to deal with, but at least you could deal with them and at least they met you at the bargaining table. We fought to get a deal, not to destroy the workplace that provided security and employment for all, regardless of what side of the table you sat on.

Vale says they can’t run under the current structure. The answer is simple: give it up to someone who can, such as a Canadian company, listed on the TSX. Put it up for sale and go back to Brazil.

Dave Campbell is a Vale Inco retiree and Local 6500 past president.

 

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments or postings to myNews. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

7 Comments

  • Another artical today about contoling cost and our aging infastructure and it's true but that's mining . Yes you have to reinvest and find cheaper and be more cost efficiant I won't argue that but my point is mining is all about making moneymore» , not just the company but the miners too. The basics of mining are the faster and harder you work with out getting hurt the more money you make . the more money a miner makes the more he produces and the more the company makes . it makes sense to me to have a high ball miner making $100,000 yearly breaking tons of muck than paying two miners $60,000 for the same production and that's where vale is going wrong . There is now way a good miner will even step on a cage for 60 grand a year . A good miner utilizes every minute of his shift to make money and not get hurt doing it . I worked with the best miners in the world and what vale is trying to so with the bonus system and benifets will only attract dogf##kers and not miners . We work in a hole not because it's a fun place to work but because the money is there to be made , we're not greedy we are miners . We work in a hole not behind a desk and you have to be a smart man to bust your ass for 30 years and retire and still be healthy . We are on strike because we make too much money , what a pile of crap !«less

  • The union likes to go on strike every 3 years or so so assert their power and for greed.
    I think this strike is no different then any other except this time the company is willing to fight back, good for them.

    I can't tell you how mnay Incomore» workers I've seen sleeping on the job, or how many satellite dishes are on property so they can watch tv while doing their work lol

    With the union is been take take take and don't who cares about the company, well I guess the company does, and well they have the right to make money too.

    At one time unions were needed, but today not so much and people are getting fed up and starting to rise up, as they should.

    When the strike first started and the union made their threat support us or else that should of been a sign right there and then to back away from the union. Now they are bullying every one else, blah.

    And I think the government should take a closer look to the Inco workers who work for 3 weeks or so then apply for EI, since when do you get EI for working only 3 weeks and they can't use work hours from their time at Inco since they are still employed, not laid off etc. just on strike.

    Whether I'm right or wrong one thing I'm sick of is these strikes all the time.«less

  • Wow, great article..

  • (continued) ...but what do we know, we're just down here struggling to breathe with no Nickel source. And by the way... the Russians make a pretty good product, which we never expected. We're waiting for your company to come back on line, but wemore» can't wait forever. Please... find a way to end this. Bully your government, rally your people, do WHATEVER it takes!«less

  • What you are suggesting is that Vale purchases Inco for 17 Billion dollars when times are good, then when times are bad Vale hands the company back to the Canadians and walks away? That doesn't seem like a simple answer. I'm sure Vale wouldmore» gladly sell the company back for the 17 Billion dollar price tag now. I have concern and compassion for the Sudbury workers, but one needs to remember that this company, as well as falconbridge, were sold off to the highest bidders just a few years ago. This type of situation is happening all over the US as well, and it is OUR fault. We are selling out our own companies (especially manufacturing and other industrial sectors) and getting angry when the parent company moves all the work to India/China/Etc. My company is a long-time customer of Inco. Since November, we have had no supplier for raw nickel. We have been forced to buy our Nickel from Norilsk, in Russia. We are paying 3 TIMES AS MUCH MONEY for our raw material. Fortunately, Norilsk has assured us that the price will be below what we were paying Inco by the beginning of September. It is expensive now because Norilsk is getting hammered with Inco's worldwide customers. Once their production capacity is level with worldwide demand, Inco will probably lose the majority of their customers, even if they do come back online. Remember, our company would NEVER have looked for another source if we hadn't been devestated by Inco's shortage... and notice that I said we have been out since November.... 4 months after the strike began. Inco could have salvaged their business in those 4 months without losing international customers. The only information we receive about this strike is through the news media... and we couldn't help but notice the article about how Vale was ready to negotiate over the Voisey's mine and the union just didn't show up. This looks like the union had every intention of having a year-long strike... but what do we know, we'r«less

  • Maybe Vale Do Rio Doce will feel generous and build a mining museum for Sudbury once they have depleted our resources and seek their next victim. Perhaps we could name it the "Rick Bartolucci Mining Museum" since he is being so proactive asmore» our MPP.«less

  • Good artical Mr.Campbell but all for not . The negative support in this town is just mind boggeling and we as steelworkers have been abiding to the law and rules of a well manered strike . The people in this town just don't get it, this regime frommore» brazil will run these plants and mines into the ground and leave when the high grading is done leaving unprofitable ore bodies behind . Sudbury , the mecca of mining , will become another Elliot Lake . What will Bill Day be hauling then , crush stone and topsoil . How about all the contractors , they'll be working else where and taking their paychecks with them . The mining service sector that Sudbury is famed for will disappear . WAKE UP SUDBURY before it's too late show some guts , if not for our union then for your OWN town ! These mines and plants are ours,let's get rid of this THIRD WORLD COMPANY .«less

NorthernLife.ca Top 10