New arena should be built close to schools - Louis Delongchamp

Mar 17, 2010- 2:54 PM

By: Sudbury Northern Life Staff

Recently, Gil Penalosa from the Walk and Bike for Life Organization made a presentation to city council. He explained that Mississauga was preparing to build 16 soccer fields in Erindale Park.

Penalosa showed a map of the soccer fields, then showed a second map where the fields are spread out all over Mississauga. This is a better solution, he said, because now all the participants can walk or bike to the soccer fields for a higher quality of life.

This is a sound idea, and applied in Sudbury suggests that instead of building a group of soccer fields at Frood and Lasalle, whatever funds are available should be used to build or upgrade fields all around the community so that we can walk or bike to them for improved quality of life.

It is impossible to walk and bike to arenas during the winter, but the idea of bringing the arenas closer to the people can be achieved. The users of arenas are mostly students, and in the same way that gymnasiums are attached to high schools, there should be an arena made available to schools as well.

Arenas are expensive, so the schools would have to be brought closer to the arenas. For example an arena could be built between Collège Boréal and École secondaire Macdonald-Cartier.

Then Sudbury Secondary School, instead of renovating the school, could sell their land and buildings, getting a very good price for them, and buy land next to Boréal and build a new school where they would be able to share the arena.

Marymount College has the problem of not having any land where students can exercise. They could relocate to the Boréal area as well, and have access to a huge recreational area.

When students play hockey in the evening, they must be accompanied by a coach. There has to be security for the building and health care must be on hand to look after injuries. The students must be transported to the arena and then back home. This causes a lot of extended and overtime hours to be worked and carries a high transportation cost. With schools clustered around an arena, the students can play hockey during the regular day hours.

All the students would be able to use the arena, especially those for whom costs are a burden. Students needing regular access to arenas could choose to attend these schools while students interested in other activities would choose other schools. The arena would also be used evenings by other groups of people from the community.

Louis Delongchamp
Greater Sudbury

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

2 Comments

  • So you want a new arena right between 2 french schools?
    Yeah, we can see right through your idea.

    Bottom line is that Sudbury already owns plenty of land and a spot called Barrydowne Arena. It also owns the plot of land right opposite of Gordon Street. That was earmarked for the proposed police HQ 20 years ago.

    Before we start planning personal visions, its time to audit what we have. See how we can upgrade and add onto existing venues.
    -Sudbury Arena installed ice equipment for a 2nd pad in the upgrade 7 years ago. The parking lot to the North was intended for a 2nd pad.
    -Countryside has both land and existing ice equipment, and pre-designed for a twin pad.
    -Barrydowne has the land and existing building. It needs less than 3/4 of a million to get it back up and running. Better than before.
    Time to look at the 3P rule of getting our ice rinks back. Other cites do it. It's the responsible and economical solution.
    Keep back door language politics out of it.

  • Looking at the location of schools to ensure their growth and play a key role in the community is vital. One element that is forgotten in this letter, is that schools serve a local neighbourhood and they must be centrally located to ensure that children have access to a community school. You do not determine the future of a school according to the location of a hockey rink -not unless you are creating a Hockey Academy...

    Thus Marymount and Sudbury Secondary are in the downtown core and serve this population. Both english school boards already have schools in New Sudbury that serve students living in this part of the city. The real question is why do we destroy centralized infrastructure and deprive certain neighbourhoods- will Cambrian Arena be destroyed? Will Barrydowne Arena be replaced? Why aren't there any centralized hockey rinks? Can we better serve the downtown core by converting the former St-Louis-de-GOnzague/St. Aloysius schools site into a public soccer or recreational facility. Emptying the downtown area of two high schools will only deplete the area of two well known institutions that draw people to the area.

FacebookTwitterRSSVideophotoNewsletterMobile