HomeLetters to the Editor

Scottish voting model would mean fairer elections

By: Letter to the Editor

 | Sep 02, 2014 - 10:21 AM |
 Re: Letter “Grits, Tories would never back voting change” published Aug. 26.

On your letters page of Aug. 26, William E. McLeod wrote, “Proportional representation has some dirty little secrets that most of its proponents choose to keep hidden. Wilfred Day of Port Hope let one slip out (re: Aug. 21 letter “Most Canadians want to end ‘unfair elections’ ”). He admits that systems of proportional representation have no local MPs."

I said the very opposite: Israel has no local MPs, unlike the Scottish proportional representation model that I prefer.

I noted some readers don't know how proportional representation works and Mr. McLeod has proven my point. He wrote, "The other dirty secret is the question of who gets to occupy the seats in Parliament and who chooses them."

Under the model recommended for Canada by the Law Commission of Canada (inspired by Scotland's), voters still elect local MPs. Voters also help elect a few regional MPs to top-up the results in the region (such as Northern Ontario), so that all voters count equally.

In Northern Ontario in 2011, that would have meant a regional Conservative MP and a regional Liberal MP, because northern NDP voters were over-represented in 2011, unlike most of the rest of Ontario (like my region).

Every MP faces the voters. You have two votes: one for your local MP; one for a regional MP.

Mr. McLeod doubts any Liberals and Conservatives support proportional representation. Many Liberal MPs in fact do, starting with Stephane Dion, but also Joyce Murray and many others.

Liberal voters everywhere but in Newfoundland were cheated of fair representation in 2011. Many Conservatives support it, too, starting with Hugh Segal and Patrick Boyer. Conservative voters in Quebec, Newfoundland, Northern Ontario and Vancouver Island were under-represented by the 2011 election results.

Finally, Mr. McLeod says proportional representation would necessitate a constitutional amendment. The Law Commission was very clear that it would not, because the number of MPs from each province would not change.

Wilfred Day
Port Hope

Like what you're reading? Click here to make us your homepage today!

Reader's Feedback

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by clicking the "X" on the top right of the comment in question. Comment Guidelines

Local Business Directory