Bracelet system separates drinkers from drivers

Dan Gauthier, left, and Zach Clattenberg model their red 'no drinks' bracelets. The two developed the Drinking and Driving Monitoring System (DDMS), after Gauthier saw the aftermath of the accident that claimed the lives of three teenagers in Hanmer this past summer. Supplied photo.

Dan Gauthier, left, and Zach Clattenberg model their red 'no drinks' bracelets. The two developed the Drinking and Driving Monitoring System (DDMS), after Gauthier saw the aftermath of the accident that claimed the lives of three teenagers in Hanmer this past summer. Supplied photo.

Dec 23, 2009- 2:15 PM

Cost deterring bars from adopting system

By: Stacey Lavallie - Sudbury Northern Life

It was just past midnight on June 21 when Dan Gauthier came upon a scene he said will be forever in his mind: the flashing white, blue and red lights of a police cruiser.

He was about 15 minutes behind the car that struck the three teens walking on the side of the road, instantly killing two and sending a third to the hospital, who later died.

Twenty-six-year-old Nicholas Piovesan, who was later arrested and charged with three counts each of impaired driving causing death, criminal negligence causing death, failing to stop at a collision and driving with more than the legal limit of alcohol in his blood, struck three teens who were walking on the side of the road. Piovesan eventually crashed into the side of a house at 21 Oscar St.

Over the next day few days, Gauthier and his friend, Zach Clattenberg, talked about what Gauthier had seen. As more details about the accident became available, as well as news of the deaths of the three teens, Gauthier said he really wanted to do something to prevent an accident like what he had seen from ever happening again.

He and Clattenberg worked together to develop the Drinking and Driving Monitoring System (DDMS), which uses coloured bracelets to determine whether an individual is a drinker or a driver. Those who are drinking wear yellow wristbands on the right wrist, while those driving wear a red wristband instead.

For servers and bar security, this indicates who is allowed to drink and who isn't, and allows designated drivers to receive free, non-alcoholic drinks.

The system is currently being used by My Cousin Vinny's in Hanmer, and Cranky Joe's Roadhouse on Notre Dame Avenue. The system debuted at Cranky Joe's, and DDMS worked with the owner, Rob Ferrucci, to tweak it. To address those who may remove bracelets, the bar instituted a no bracelets, no drink policy.

Other bars, however, don't seem too interested in the program, said Gauthier.

"What I found this summer, when I talked to the bar owners here in Sudbury, is they feel they don't want to spend the extra (money) on hiring extra bouncers to monitor, to administer bracelets, things like that. So a lot of the bars weren't interested because of that factor."

Even the bars that use the system sometime run into difficulty during the holidays, or on very busy nights. The bouncers can't keep up with the amount of people coming in.

"We didn't do it last night, because we didn't have enough manpower to actually put it out there," said Ferrucci, speaking about a bracelet-less night on Dec. 22.

Ferrucci says he believes DDMS is a valuable tool to help prevent impaired driving.

"It helps. Every little bit helps. It's not going to solve all the problems, because you're always going to have your drinking and driving. You just have to really get them to understand and say 'you know what guys, you can't have just one drink and drive. It's got to be 100 per cent that you haven't had a drink,'" he said.

Gauthier says he isn't deterred by the lack of interest. He wants to continue to push DDMS and hopefully see it be adopted by more drinking establishments.

Ferrucci said other bar owners should take a look into DDMS.

"I would recommend it," he said, though he notes the system isn't perfect. It does allow him and his staff to stop several people from driving after drinking, which makes it worth it.

According to Ferrucci, three security staff are out in the parking lot watching to see if yellow-bracelet patrons are getting into vehicles to drive. If they won't get out of the vehicle and let a red bracelet drive, or use alternative methods to go home, security will inform the driver the police will be called.

He has also funded a ride-home system not unlike Operation Red Nose that runs on all nights, all year long.

Bar patrons are given a yellow bracelet if they intend to drink, and a red one if they don't. Red bracelets get free, non-alcoholic drinks during the evening. Supplied photo.

Bar patrons are given a yellow bracelet if they intend to drink, and a red one if they don't. Red bracelets get free, non-alcoholic drinks during the evening. Supplied photo.

"Now people don't have an excuse (to drink and drive)," he said. He and his staff have called the police after impaired drivers have left the bar, though Ferrucci couldn't comment on the results of those calls.

Gauthier and Clattenberg held a fundraising car wash this summer to raise the money to create bracelets, and are now looking for volunteers to help DDMS make a difference.

"We want to get a team of volunteers together so we can supply (bars) with people - volunteers - to put bracelets on and to monitor, just so they don't have to have that extra cost," he explained. He said he hopes that having volunteers to help during the holidays and on other busy nights will convince local bars to adopt the system.

For more information about DDMS, to obtain bracelets for a private party, or to volunteer, visit www.ddmscanada.com, or e-mail ddmscanada@hotmail.com.

Read More: Home > Sudbury News

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

16 Comments

  • No, I got the point and acknowledged it was a noble idea.
    They do deserve a pat on the back for sure...
    BUT, if status quo hold firm and a drunk driver wearing this band gets into an accident? then what?
    the blame game is going to shift right to these two because using their system clearly means you have control over a
    DUI but Reality is, you don't at all. so setting up a flawed solutiion does what? & protects who?

    look at the ride programs for this christmas... no one was drinking and driving through the ride programs?
    hmmmm...

  • sandman, I think your completely missing the point of these young people. Rather than just giving up and possibly becoming offenders themselves they are disgusted in what they saw and are trying to find a solution and for that they deserve a pat of the back. With any luck all their friends will see the efforts and join the anti-DUI crowd and not the ones that sit of the fence or a$$.

  • So, While the reality of stopping drinking and driving would be great. there will just never be enough effort to ever come close to accomplished that goal. there are just too many enabling factors that will never be resolved.
    Man power, alcohol revenue, the ability to shift blame from the offender to anyone they may have come in contact with during the evening, tails chasing sure creates the illusion of being busy busy doesn't it.

    It is nice to see the cops out stopping folks though.
    the problem is that when they do these ride programs.
    less than .001 %of the cars stopped are actually possible "offenders". fallng into a "warning range"? what is that if you are over then you are over, if you aren't... then you AREN'T.

    The numbers don't lie, do the math.

  • looking for everyone else to blame besides the driver IS a witch hunt. What else do you call it? as far as a conspiracy goes?
    Well, the problem exists doesn't it?
    it IS the government selling you the booze...
    at least reality is more realistic than a bracelet stopping one from driving drunk.

    Like I said it is a noble idea, but flawed.
    and another post was right.
    the bar owner has already been nailed to the cross on this, is it a wonder he is jumping on board?

    I guess if you chose to believe the fuzzy warmness of it all, then great. Bury your head in the sand

  • Great idea but I think some people need more then just a bracelet to control there behaviour. We have seen enough other alcohol related charges in the news this year. Have a safe New Years and please don't drink and drive.

  • Behavior doesn't change until it becomes a value. Not smoking, not drinking and driving and safety in the work place have become values and are working. The problem is it takes between 10 and 20 years for a behavior to change and become a value. Our children make it happen. God bless their intellegence.

  • Dan & Zach, anyone trying everything humanly possible to stomp out DUI is a true HERO in my books and to this community. Our hats goes off to you both and I hope this is very successful. Change is obviously needed in this town town now that I've spent a whole week listening to people talking about the latest victim who was "the passenger" with a drunk driver. Loss of life is terrible for everyone but... these people in the last accident could have taken out a family because it's not being reported the victim tried calling the police or taking away the drivers (his friends) keys.

  • A good idea ! for sure! Tho what needs to happen is for attitudes towards drinking & driving to change in a big way. It is sooo un-cool to drink & drive! Once these dinosaurs (drinking drivers) become extinct....this will be a much safer place to live

  • At least they are trying...
    Be smart this year folks
    Don't drink and drive.

  • The only bar operating this system is coincidentally the same bar that served (allegedly of course) the driver to the point of intoxication.

  • VERY GOOD U2 FOR IMMPLEMENTING SUCH A FABULOUS IDEA, NOW I THINK OUR GOV'T AND OR MADD SHOULD STAND BEHIND THESE YOUNG FELLOWS AND BACK THERE PLAN, IF BARS DON'T WANT TO FOLLOW THESE SIMPLE RULES TAKE THEIR LCBO LICENCES AWAY FOR GOOD, SEE HOW FAST THEY ODOPT THE PROGRAM WHEN IT CAUSES THE LOSS OF SUCH LCBO LICENCES TOBE REVOKED AND THE CASH FLOW THAT COMES WITH SUCH LICENCES, CAUSE FACE IT...THESE LICENCES BRING IN ALOT OF REVENUE...
    AGAIN A CONCERNED CITIZEN

  • Spot checks every nights would be great. The reality is that the required man power isn't there and the funding to conduct the checks isn't here. The only reason the police can cunduct more spot checks over the holidays is because of government funding.

    I must say that your tales of witchhunting and governent conspiracies are very entertaining. Make sure you don't miss Santa flying tonight.

    Merry Christmas, try being a little more realistic and positive.

  • well why would a bar owner have to be cheap to not want to bother with DDMS?
    A witch hunt is a witch hunt and nothing more.
    if anyone was truly serious about stopping the D&D issues then all that needs to be done is spot check everyroad leading away from a bar at 3 am... but you know what?
    there are never any, dozens of people drive home drink nightly from bars, stop people going in and out of liquor & beer stores. I mean until you go to the source it is mearly a cash cow.

    blogs are a collective conscious and it isn't always sunny.
    all these unsolvable problems occur the second to take the sole responsibilty away from the driver and shift to a host or bar or restaurant... why not go as far as the liquor or beer store?
    why stop at the bar owner?
    because they are govenment runned?
    probably more truth to that than anyone wants to admit.
    it is a money machine playing & feeding on emotion & tragedy.

  • Ultimatly it's the individual who chooses to drive or not. Unfortunatly the drinking establishments have had the responsiblity to eliminate drinking and driving placed on their shoulders. This now lays out the foundation for the blame game.

    Now just for thought, There is a diference between drunk/intoxicated, impaired and over 80. Every one knows what the drunk person looks like, no argument there and that is where the smart serve program comes in. For the impaired, that is difficult to monitor because a person can feel a little "buzz" however others may not see any signs yet, ie: servers.This person can operate functionaly but there reaction time is slowed, thus impaired. And lastly, over 80. One, two drinks, who knows. You can feel completly sober and have over the provincial limit of 0.05 or a seasoned drinker over the criminal limit of 0.08 and no one would know it until a spot check. Then the finger pointing starts.

    I briefly pointed that out to indicate that the issue isn't black and white which is why this bracelet program is a step in the right direction to reduce the amount of drivers who have been drinking. This program is a great tool, it has flaws just like anything else but if the issue was so simple, it would have been solved years ago. The article says "It helps. Every little bit helps. It's not going to solve all the problems...". People are always going to sneak drinks to there friends and so on. So no system will be 100 % but every effort helps.

    I think this is an excellent program that should be used in all the bars. It's unfortunate that the majority of owners are to cheap to use it or at least give free drinks to DD's.

    It's an ongoing issue, instead of bashing the idea, put a better one forward or at least make your critisism constructive.

  • This is a flawed & pointless process. as long as the witchhunt for blame is still going beyond the person DRIVING. these bars are only making themselve more liable for something the have no control over.

    Considering the fact that this smart serve program the bars require EVERY SERVER to have pretty much dictates that one is to be cut off clearly way before anyone ever is.
    no one follows that rule, NO ONE!!!

    if a customer is getting DRUNK in their establishment they are serving them well beyond the point smart serve allows, so why don't they cut them off rather then continue to serve them...and that is the $$$
    this is all smoke & mirrors to create the illusion of being proactive in stopping this D&D problem.

    all bars already don't follow the SMART SERVE

    Smart serve = fail
    DDMS = fail

    BARS taking your money with one hand & call the cops on you with the other is SO horribly evil... I'm not even sure what to call that?

    This is only effective if one choses to take part, the problem is that after a few drinks, you don't really care about that much anymore, or well it becomes less of a concern and you feel you are fine to drive.

    the second one decides not to participate, this is no long effective.

    However, I wish them luck, the idea is a noble one for sure but it is naive at best.

  • Bracelet or no bracelet, the choice to drink and drive still resides in the individual.
    Nothing stops a person from changing their mind and snapping off a bracelet or having a friend purchase them a drink.

    We must STOP deflecting the responsibility onto bars and back where it belongs. On the driver.

    We are inundated with media messages not to drink and drive. It is socially unacceptable. Yet we keep finding excuses to blame others.
    What happens when a plastic bracelet patron gets done for impaired? Does he sue the bar for serving him/her? (You bet they will. And the last thing a bar needs is another lame blame seeking lawsuit.)
    What a wasted effort this bangle idea is.

FacebookTwitterRSSVideophotoNewsletterMobile