Home > Sudbury News

Sudbury might not appeal to young professionals: study

If you want to see what the futur holds for Sudbury, just look to Elliot Lake as a ...

Posted by: Joe Mama

Read All Comments

Article Tools

Bookmark and Share
Jul 31, 2009

By: Ed Veilleux - Sudbury Northern Life Staff

When the baby boomers started their careers, they often moved where the jobs were.

That won't be the case for the next generation, according to a study released by Next Generation Consulting.

The firm has studied the residential and relocation patterns of 20-40 year olds since 1998, and has developed an indexing system that evaluates a city based on the assets that are “important to next gen workers.”

“Today, young up-and-comers pick their cities — those with the amenities and 'vibe' they value — and then look for jobs,” NGC's website states. “Sometimes to their parents’ chagrin.”
If the consulting firm is right, Sudbury might be in for a problem, having ranked 22 out of 27 Canadian cities.

The Next Cities: Top Canadian Hotspots for Young, Talented Workers study, released on July 28, ranked cities across Canada with a population of more than 100,000, on each city's appeal to young professionals.

The study came about after the firm surveyed 39,000 workers between the age of 20-40, who work in “knowledge-based occupations,” ranging from teaching and health care to advanced manufacturing and consulting. All workers who use or manipulate data and information are considered “knowledge workers.”

The firm asked the participants why they live and work where they do, and the seven indexes, or ranking factors that make up the study, were found to be prominent among the “next gen” workers.

“This is something every city and business leader in Canada needs to be thinking about,” said NGC’s founder, Rebecca Ryan.

“Attracting and retaining talent is incredibly important, because the demographic challenges simply aren't going to go away.”

According to NGC, the seven factors that are important to judging a “next city” are: earning, learning, vitality, around town, after hours, cost of lifestyle, and social capital. The rankings announced in the study are based on a city's total score in all seven indexes.

“Simply being the cheapest place to live, or the city with the most jobs is not a longterm workforce strategy,” Ryan said. “Although jobs are important, the next generation is very savvy about choosing where they’ll live. They look carefully at quality of life factors like how much time they’re going to spend in traffic commuting, if they can live near a park or hike-and-bike trail, and whether a city’s downtown stays awake after five.

“The Next Cities list ranks cities that are, or have the capacity to be, great places to live and work for the next generation.”

The ranking study includes 45 measures in seven indexes, including air quality, location of parks, the local arts scene and job diversity.

Vitality is the first index. It tallies air and water quality, measures green space and estimates residents’ overall health (e.g. obesity, life expectancy, etc.).

The second index is earning. It measures a city’s future job growth, the diversity of employment opportunities, the percentage of jobs in the knowledge-based sector, average household income, and more.

Learning is the third index. It tallies educational opportunities and expenditures, public library use, Wi-Fi hotspots, and more.

Fourth, is social capital, a term coined by Jane Jacobs in her 1961 book The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Social capital accounts for how open, safe, and accessible a city is to all people. It includes measures of diversity, crime rates, voter participation rates, and the percentage of women- and minority-owned businesses.

Cost of lifestyle is the fifth index. It includes “a roof over the head, food on the table, clothes on the back, and a warm bed at night,” according to the study.

The sixth index is called, “after hours.” It takes into account the places to go and things to do after work and on weekends.

Around Town is the seventh, and last, index. It measures a city’s “walkability,” airport activity, commute times, and mass transit opportunities such as busing.

With knowledge workers in Canada accounting for more than 25 per cent of the total workforce, and growth in the number of these jobs occurring in all parts of the country, according to the NGC, these workers are economically critical to cities and regions that can attract and keep them.

“Jobs matter to the next generation,” according to the New Cities study. “But jobs are not enough. A good job may bring a young professional to your city, but (his or her) experience of the city will keep or repel them.”

When describing “next cities,” the study states, “Think bustling city centres, walkable neighbourhoods, diverse career opportunities, and a vibrant art and music scene.”

Canada's “super cities” (those with more than 500,000 people) appeal to many young professionals, according to the NCG, because of their unsurpassed hustle and bustle.

Although the firm warns people to take care in choosing. As cities get larger, they tend to do very well in just a few indexes, while failing in others, the study states.

Small but significant, “mighty micros” (with 100,000 to 200,000 people), like Sudbury, may not have all the “fancy-schmancy amenities” of the super cities, but they more than make up for it in their accessibility and ease of getting around, the study states.

“In these cities, you don’t have to wrestle rush-hour traffic, and you’ll probably learn the names of all your neighbours,” the study states.

Next Cities: Rankings
The cities listed below have high cumulative scores in all seven indexes.
Rank, City, Province
1 Victoria, British Columbia
2 Ottawa, Ontario
3 Vancouver, British Columbia
4 Kingston, Ontario
5 Halifax, Nova Scotia
6 Toronto, Ontario
7 Calgary, Alberta
8 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
9 London, Ontario
10 Edmonton, Alberta
11 Winnipeg, Manitoba
12 Regina, Saskatchewan
13 Thunder Bay, Ontario
14 St. Catharines-Niagara, Ontario
15 Saint John, New Brunswick
16 Montreal, Quebec
17 Kitchener, Ontario
18 St. John’s, Newfoundland & Labrador
19 Quebec City, Quebec
20 Hamilton, Ontario
21 Sherbrooke, Quebec
22 Sudbury, Ontario
23 Oshawa, Ontario
24 Windsor, Ontario
25 Abbotsford, British Columbia
26 Trois-Rivieres, Quebec
27 Saguenay, Quebec

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments or postings to myNews. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

8 Comments

  • If you want to see what the futur holds for Sudbury, just look to Elliot Lake as a model.

  • (cont'd -sorry!)
    Sadly, I simply don't have the heart to put a half century of work into a city whose public figures bicker and get nothing accomplished, and who make the battle too difficult to change Sudbury. Perhaps -- and I say thismore» realistically; not cynically -- Sudbury should stop trying to lure YPs altogether, and rest on its city-town atmosphere to attract those that do choose to stay here instead.«less

  • (cont'd - sorry!)
    After Hours: Ha-ha. Bingo and drinking. If quality of life were good in Sudbury, you might not even find BINGO. YPs often share some interests with older folks, and you would find the old folks would not be playing Bingo either ifmore» after hours had better things to do.

    Around Town: Later in the article, someone claims "[cities] like Sudbury ... more than make up for it in their accessibility and ease of getting around". I'll have you know that this is an absolute and out-right LIE about Sudbury. If there is one place We don't make the cut more, it's in accessibility and getting around.

    Make every bus in this city accessible, and you will still have drivers who treat this city's misfortuned with disdain. Minorities, disabled, mentally ill, you name it. I watched a driver yell at a blind man for not telling the driver that his stop was reached. How could he know, if we still don't have stop call-out systems??

    And as for the routes, many of them are still 1-2 hours between arrivals. Sunday and after 10pm service is an outrage. How long should a wheelchair bound person wait, to hope for a bus that he can get on? He certainly can't roll himself to his destination, given the state of our roads and sidewalks, assuming the road has a sidewalk.

    Wonder aloud why YPs leave but our city is unappealing to the young, who have eyes that see discrimination everywhere against young, old, minority, and disabled. Why would we want to retire here when we know our treatment will be just as bad, if not worse by the time we are golden-yeared?

    For my part, my hope died for this city when city council started bickering about performance arts centres downtown, and when I saw Dr. Robinson attached to that group that wants to regreen the train tracks downtown. What a great idea, I thought, before roughly estimating that it would be 50 years before we saw the benefits of that change.

    Sadly, I simply don't have the h«less

  • As a young professional (YP) in Sudbury, I wanted to take the time to give an impression from "our side". I also want to start by saying that despite its flaws, Sudbury IS a nice "town", and the whole world should not be judged onlymore» on how YPs view a city.

    The headline states Sudbury "might not" appeal to YPs. This is an overly optimistic guess as to what YPs think about Sudbury. The truth is it doesn't appeal to YPs.

    Vitality: This city is fat (me, too). Green space refers to parks, most of ours are full of rusted childrens' equipment. Google "Botanical Garden" for a park idea. Sudbury routinely claims it has reduced SO2 emissions. However, "most improved" is not "best in class".

    Earning: My industry (software programming) consistently makes 10k less in Sudbury than anywhere else. This is measured from a group of programmer friends (9 people) whose job titles were compared across Monster.com ads in Ottawa and Toronto.

    Learning: Laurentian just recently got a Masters of Computational Science which has enticed me to invest another 3 years in town. There are very few "professional" programs at Laurentian.

    Social Capital: Don't fool yourself, this city has none. By the way you should also read "Dark Age Ahead" by Jane Jacobs. It spells out the problems all cities are having.

    Cost of Lifestyle: When rents went up, I was shocked. I have friends in downtown Toronto and Ottawa who are paying $750+ utilities for a 2-bedroom, while I'm paying $950+hydro (a bargain at the time). I don't include in my apartment search the "rat traps" that were mentioned by another poster.«less

  • Sadly I must agree with MAB and Motorboat... somewhat.

    Sudbury is a city attempting to grow with a small community-based mentality that everything must close on Sundays at 5. Where else can you find a Walmart that is NOT 24 hours?

    Sudbury does notmore» attract knowledge-based jobs or minds only because there is no support for innovation from city planners or counselors.

    Sudbury's growth is suffocated with a lack of faster through-way traffic routes. And yes, the roads here are bad.

    Sudbury's boom periods lacked proper planning that should have dictated developed recreational areas throughout. Our green areas for the most part are JUST that. Green bush.

    Albeit, Sudbury suffers from highly expensive infrastructure costs, blasting through rock and swamp to build anything and amalgamation was a huge financial blow that is taking many years to overcome. But our city counselors need to encourage if not push for more creativity, diversity and open-mindedness when it comes to planning the future of our city.«less

  • cont'd
    Our roads are falling apart and so are the sidewalks. You have to drive on clogged roads to get anywhere.

    Face it folks, if you want your youth to succeed, get them to move before the entire place implodes. Go where their property will bemore» worth something in the future. Where diversified jobs opportunities are. Go where the city leaders have vision and invest in the future. Not waste time making closed door deals.«less

  • Well said Motorboat. A closer look at the index really shows why youth would want to flee our failing city.
    1- Vitality. It tallies air and water quality, measures green space and estimates residents’ overall health
    - Sulphur emissions dumps us rightmore» there. And as for green space? Well the only plus there is the increased amount of scrub brush in the area. Overall health? Cancer from a sedentary lifestyle that has bingo as the #1 entertainment source surely hurts our rank there. The "Bingosaurus" is doing quite well here.
    2-Earning. It measures a city’s future job growth, the diversity of employment opportunities, the percentage of jobs in the knowledge-based sector, average household income, and more.
    -There has been zero growth in new industry with good paying jobs. We are still a one industry based town. Do you consider working at a call centre or store good income?
    3-Learning.
    -The heavily subsidized Boreal must have gotten the brownie points here. Most folks go elsewhere for quality post secondary education. Laurentian is pummelled in Maclean's annual ranking.
    4-Social capital.
    -Crime rates? Read the police section and see the number of property crimes, drugs, assaults and robberies. 'nuf said. Look at how tired people are of having french rammed down our throats.
    5-Cost of lifestyle.
    - This is a red herring. As most costs for basic goods are the same all over Ontario. There's a falsehood that has groceries and goods more expensive in the South. However we pay huge property taxes for little services. - THATS a killer.
    6-“After hours.” It takes into account the places to go and things to do after work and on weekends.
    - No 24 hour shopping. A dead downtown. Lame festivals with C-class entertainment and the same rotating group of face painters and hot dog vendors. Broken and closed arenas and parks. Relatives and friends visiting often ask, "Is there ANYTHING to do here?"
    7-Around Town.
    -Our transit is adequate. Ou«less

  • The article should read "Sudbury DOES NOT appeal to young professionals", because in reality it doesnt, and it hasnt for many many years.

    Only through the recent boom were we able to retain a few handfuls of youth but now that its gone bustmore» you will see this trend reverse again.

    I have been saying it for years that this city loses youth due to lack of jobs, lack of job diversity, lack of entertainment, poor public transportation, lack of affordable or vacant apartments (that arent complete rat shacks), and a general lack of respect for young people in this city. Lets not forget also the store hours by-law.

    Most of us have known this for years and yet somehow council cant seem to wrap their heads around it. Its funny how we have become this huge center for education and yet none of these people want to stay here.

    I think its too late to reverse this trend, Sudbury already has a bad reputation and there are far too many things that need fixing. It would literally take years to correct this problem, provided council decides to wake up and do something about it. And I dont think they will or even care for that matter.«less