Home > Sudbury News

Barrydowne Extension inches forward

Municipal Road 80 is busy twice a day - other than that you could land an airplane on it. If you don't like the traffic, get up earlier, or move back into ...

Posted by: SirGalahad

Read All Comments

Article Tools

Jan 17, 2010

By: Ed Veilleux - Sudbury Northern Life Staff

Hanmer, Valley and Capreol residents are one step closer to having a quicker way home from New Sudbury, Ward 6 Coun. André Rivest said.

The Barrydowne extension, which has been talked about for years, could be mapped out by August, the councilor said.

A request for proposal has been sent out by the city looking for companies to bid on the study portion of the extension.

The study will identify the “exact corridor” to be used for the extension, Rivest said.

The road will likely join Notre Dame Street in Hanmer to the corner of Barrydowne Road and Maley Drive in New Sudbury, Rivest said.

The reason for the extension would be to alleviate traffic concerns on other main roads.

“The problem with Municipal Road 80 right now, at the Lasalle intersection, all the way north, (is that it) is just about at capacity,” Rivest said.

He cited a city report, which stated: “The growth in Valley East over the past few years has resulted in a significant increase in traffic volume on this route. This growth has occurred faster than forecasted during the last transportation study (1992). Municipal Road 80 is currently operating at or near capacity during peak hours.”

Rivest added: “We need the Barrydowne extension to help suppress this.”

The study was budgeted for in 2009, the councillor said.

“The important thing here is to let people know that we are doing the study, the one we budgeted for in 2009.”

There will be two public meetings during the study, in between late May and late June, Rivest said.

“This is where people have to tell us what they want from us.”

Bookmark and Share

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments or postings to myNews. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

10 Comments

  • Municipal Road 80 is busy twice a day - other than that you could land an airplane on it. If you don't like the traffic, get up earlier, or move back into town.

  • while i am not opposed to this project, I am sure the residents of New Sudbury along Barrydowne will be overjoyed at the increase in traffic...I for one would not want to live in that corridor once its completed...would not a effective public transit system make more sense? And yes i agree let us not use the same road wizards to build it and the same pathetic excuse for planning where they tear it up 4 or 5 times after paving...our city could not plan their way out of an outhouse,

  • I disagree with you Philip Morris. Sudbury needs more major arteries. Our population is growing. The roads that we have are at capacity, if not exceeding it. In order to help our city expand and grow, we need to increase the amount of infrastructre. That's a fact. Plain and simple. The Valley is the fastest growing community outside of the city. The amount of construction on new homes and development in the Valley proves that fact. You claim that money was just spent fixing the Highway from New Sudbury to the Valley (and it was...) however, that nice, new road won't last with the increased amount of traffic that it's seen in the last 10 years. The city is finally being smart about something... and looking in the future...not just the present. It's refreshing actually..

    And as for your comment about moving closer to work...well...not everyone can afford a house in Sudbury with the prices the way they are. You can still get a house in the valley for 150,000 that's in good condition...good luck finding that in Sudbury. Besides, if everyone DID move to the city closer to their places of work, the local roads would still have to be improved, maintained or (heaven forbid) new roads built to accomodate the increase in population. However, that would be pretty hard considering that most of Sudbury is already built up with no room for new roads (huh...interesting...)...so what then??

    I used to live in Southern Ontario. The commute was terrible. But I couldn't move closer to work because I couln't afford a house. (Hence the reason why people move outside the city). Now I live in the Valley. And I love it. My opinion? Build the road!!!

  • No CCNR, I'm smarter than that.
    I do, however, drive those roads frequently and pay taxes. Smart enough to see a huge waste of money on an unneeded road. We can't even repair and maintain the roads we already have!
    Don't bother debating the cold, clear facts I presented. Just put your hand out, and ask for money. Screw the reality you want a new road, right?

  • What a joke. Pure political grandstanding.
    And just how does Rivest propose to end the gridlock once his personal vision reaches the intersection at Lasalle Boulevard? Any study done on the dumping of all that traffic onto Barrydowne, Lasalle, and the Kingsway? How about all the traffic that'll turn onto the new Maley extension and STILL get clogged at the Data Centre intersection? LOL

    Imagine that. A 4 lane highway filtering into the busiest intersection in New Sudbury. Right smack in the middle of 2 major malls and dense population centre.

    The city just spent millions on resurfacing and expanding 69 North. And Rivest isn't satisfied. The people of that portion of the region have 3 ways to get into the city core. 69N, 144, and Radar Road.
    Spending tens (probably hundreds) of millions on an unnecessary new road is irresponsible. The commute from Valley East isn't even a long one. Compare it to REAL commuters in Southern Ontario that have hours to drive, in heavy traffic.

    Want to save time on your drive folks? MOVE closer to your work.
    Finally, where are all the environmentalists? Where is their outrage in the paving of virgin bush area? The pro-transit lobby? Yeah, conveniently silent at the idea of a new road to get 10 minutes quicker to gridlock in New Sudbury.

  • Oh my god..! Get a life... we know it needs building! Don't waste money on a study. Get planning, put out tenders, build it! Preferably by a contractor who can finish the job within the next decade... not the usual old boys brigade!
    Believe it or not, people can exist without Tim Hortons! What is it with people here? They have cups of coffee welded permenantly to their hands!

  • 10 cheers for Andre!!!

    HIP HIP HURRAY!!!
    HIP HIP HURRAY!!!
    HIP HIP HURRAY!!!
    HIP HIP HURRAY!!!
    HIP HIP HURRAY!!!
    HIP HIP HURRAY!!!
    HIP HIP HURRAY!!!
    HIP HIP HURRAY!!!
    HIP HIP HURRAY!!!
    HIP HIP HURRAY!!!

  • This is awesome, way the go Andre Rivest. You will have people for and against this, I'm sure but this will help many in the long run. This will reduce the traffic on Regional Rd 80 by a big percentage, less accidents for sure. And if they connect Main st in Val Caron & the new Maley Extension this would be so great. Garson would see a reduction in traffic of almost 50 percent. Now we will need a Tim Hortons on Notre Dame street in Hanmer.

  • Great since it will shave like 10 mins off my way to work, I wonderwould it increase population on the Notre dame road area, would it increase or decrease the property value of surrounding homes, to have the access to that part of new sudbury, its gonna be like the new newsudbury but in hanmer.
    Maybe some rich developer is going to put some subdivision on garson lake off the highwat , hey there is already hydro overhead.

  • Almost at capacity? Beyond capacity is what it should have read....during "rush" hour that is.
    The rest of the time it's not much of a problem getting into town from the Valley.
    Is it really worth spending so many millions to alleviate traffic twice a day?
    How about some sort of carpool promotion with incentives? I'm not a regular at that time and place, but the few times where i had no choice but wait at the top of the hill, most cars had just a driver. Perhaps the larger employers, like government and associated agencies, should lead the way if they aren't already doing so.
    Kind of hard to allocate so much money when there are alternatives, not to mention other roadways leading to this new extension which will need upgrading to support the increase in traffic. Dominion Dr & Notre-Dame from 69N come to mind.
    Lets hope those responsible for the decision do the necessary homework.
    BTW... how about fixing up radar road just a bit? Its falling apart. Again.