National newspapers discuss Vale Inco strike in editorials

Part of the line of vehicles waiting to enter the Copper Cliff site on March 9. Pickets have been in place now for almost eight months. Photo by Heidi Ulrichsen.

Part of the line of vehicles waiting to enter the Copper Cliff site on March 9. Pickets have been in place now for almost eight months. Photo by Heidi Ulrichsen.

Mar 10, 2010- 11:44 AM

By: Sudbury Northern Life Staff

The nearly eight-month-long labour dispute between Vale Inco and the three Steelworkers locals in Canada who are currently on strike are mentioned in two recent editorials in national newspapers.

In a March 8 Globe and Mail editorial entitled “We've sold off assets so often, branch plants 'R' us,” Jeffrey Simpson talks about how the natural resources of northeastern Ontario have been sold to foreign owners over the last few years.

“This region, like so many others in Canada, depends on trees and rocks; that is, forestry and mining. Both are struggling,” the editorial said.

“Part of the struggle, at least in the mining sector, relates to an issue no one wants to discuss in the discourse about competition: branch plants. This region's mining assets in large part have fallen into foreign hands. Gone are the nameplate Canadian companies - Inco and Falconbridge - replaced by the Anglo-Swiss Xstrata and Brazil's Vale.”

The editorial talks about how “workers at Vale's Sudbury's operations have been on strike since July 2009,” and how when Inco was purchased by Vale in 2006, the Sudbury deposits were seen as “fabulous assets” and are now “deemed too costly.”

“In fairness, the United Steelworkers union had been on strike in 2003 in Sudbury, and was hardly the easiest group to deal with when Inco and Falconbridge ran the show," the editorial reads. "The union should shoulder some of the blame for what's happened.”

Leo Hindley Jr., chairman of the Economic Growth/Smart Globalization Initiative at the North America Foundation and member of the Council on Foreign Relations, also mentions the Vale Inco strike in a March 9 Huffington Post article entitled “Tale of Two CEOs: One of Them Needs to Do Better.”

The article talks about a recent special section of the Financial Times, which focused on “individuals and companies who have displayed courage and vision in the aftermath of the most wrenching financial crisis since the Great Depression.”

One of the companies mentioned in the Financial Times section was Vale.

Hindley Jr. said Vale has operated essentially only in Brazil until fairly recently, and now operates in 36 countries. “And to its particular credit, much of  Vale's growth has been organic and achieved through steady investments in modernizing its mines and rail & port infrastructure,” the article said.

He also said “what really pisses me off is that all the while Vale has been executing of late on its grand global mission, it is, to quote the FT (Financial Times), 'embroiled in a long-running dispute' with its workers here in North America, a dispute that I lay squarely at the feet of its CEO, Roger Agnelli, and that arises from nothing other than Vale's greed and Agnelli's obstinacy.”

Read More: Home > Sudbury News

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

20 Comments

  • When a desperate union, or socialist for that matter, has nothing to defend, they turn to trotting out the good old 'Look how much the boss is making' ploy.

    Its not relevant to the negotiations. Not a part of any collective agreement. Just more smoke and mirrors. Mud sling about how the CEO and Board is making "X" dollars. Of course never mention how much Leo Gerard is making as your defacto CEO, right?
    Gerard is pulling in a 6 figure USA dollar salary. He continues to work full time. In his office tower in Pittsburgh. The closest he gets to shovelling is the fork he uses at the all expenses paid trip. The ones your union dues continue to pay.
    Where is Waldo gonna pop up next? Germany? Brazil? A return to his 'home' local for some key speeches to stir up the troops. Then back to the office in the sky.
    Want to compare executives? Ask Fera and Fraser as well how their salaries are going.
    Wow. I can't believe how anyone could justify paying themselves 6 figures while their brothers lose everything at $200 a week.
    Careful how you use the bosses salary point there Sunny.....

  • P.M.S. everyone else didn't get burned, as you say. There
    are those of us who choose wisely and don't follow the
    carrot that gets waved in front of their noses.
    Entitlement,greed and egos and 121%? Don't forget the 121%.
    There was never a fair deal offered to turn down in the first place. The strike has not shifted from the issues but rather contains many shifty issues in the contract.
    121%. Wow, I can't believe how anyone could justify paying themselves 121%.

  • I voted No today.....
    Talked to a guy that voted yes....
    I smiled and said at least my NO vote cancels your yes vote...
    It was a good day today....

  • "Do​e​s​ ​a​n​y​o​n​e​ ​h​a​v​e​ ​a​n​y​ ​i​d​e​a​s​ ​w​h​y​ ​t​h​e​ ​m​e​e​t​i​n​g​ ​i​s​ ​a​t​ ​C​a​r​u​s​o​ ​c​l​u​b​ ​a​n​d​ ​n​o​t​ ​B​r​a​d​y​ ​s​t​?"

    they have a better chicken a spagetti dinner

  • All you Local 6500 members who are considering voting to accept the Vale Inco offer, be ready.
    Last nite the Union exec met with the stewards and the H&S guys at Brady Street.
    I'm guessing these guys will be scattered around the crowd at Caruso Club tonite to loudly support the Union position and yell down anyone near them who questions it.
    Does anyone have any ideas why the meeting is at Caruso club and not Brady st?

  • Vote YES for your family's health,welfare,finance etc...
    vote No and John,Leo and Wayne will love to do more travelling around the world with a free pass, all expenses paid for while you lose your house,family...you have to vote with your conscience not by what people bully you to vote for...they only care about themselves because 90% of them have their wifes working...
    Vote for 5 years...at least you dont have to worry every 3 years you have to go through this BS...
    Vote YES...you are still getting a good bonus every 3 months,increase in wages every year of the contract...its better than sitting around at 200 a week while you can be making 1000 a week....

  • It would be nice to read the following headline:" National and Provincial Governments Discuss Vale Inco Strike"; however, it appears only newspapers are prepared to discuss the impasse.

  • -near depression- not near recession.

  • Sunny, I got "burned" like everyone else did. I rode the rise of the metals markets, pulled higher by Bre-X. I got out during the fall. I should have adjusted my investments before the tumble. But, we weren't sure how high the ceiling would be. Many people just stayed in. Letting their greed (like a certain local union) steer them. My combination of luck, good timing, and prudence put the brakes on an investment and salvaged what could have been the disaster many others experienced. (Again, knowing when to cut your losses and survive to fight and win another day. Something 6500 can't fathom)
    Bottom line is if you want to gamble your career in the mining industry, be prepared for the bust times. Your union can't win every time. Nobody is saying don't go to work in the mines. Just learn from the past. There are ups and downs. The reduction of workers, strikes, and layoffs are commonplace. You choose that shaky career, you choose to strike. You suffer the consequences.
    The strike has now shifted from the issues. Minor concessions during a near recession to a union's sense of entitlement, greed, and egos. A fair deal turned down for the sake of making a point. Kamikaze style labour action.

  • P.M.S. Did you get burned or scammed? Your Bre-X shares. You got scammed which is becoming more commonplace as your greed monger friends on wall street compete for top spot. Many a good Canadian miner has left nickel for gold. Sudbury's loss.
    Now to Sudbury where Bobbleheads have been hired to run the plants and mines during the strike and everything is falling apart.That's what Bobbleheads do. The best investment in Sudbury lies with offering a fair deal, not another scam.

  • SO did anyone everythink that instead of worrying about the layoffs that maybe just maybe the statement of we will need fewer people to continue on might have to do with vale not replacing the people that have retired? Did the younger guys ever think that if they vote no to get those few radicals their jobs back the could mean at some point they end up laid off because they stayed out for those higher seniority guys. Think about that when you vote, vote for you not what the radicals are going to try and force you to do. Like when they say we should have a vote by show of hands. Let everyone vote in private and we'll see the outcome.

  • Rooogeeer performance bonus was bases on getting those Canadians to sign the contract. I am sure his bonus is big $$$$ Vale's management team is sending out letters daily to the staff signing a different song.....come back to work 6500....come back to this new H3LL.

  • Here Here Chears!

  • So if everyone refuses to work in mining as you suggest, then it wouldn't be a good investment then would it?

  • Natural resources has always been an attractive part of my portfolio Mr.spanky.
    Getting in when its undervalued, getting out before a market collapse.
    I'll admit, I got burned during the Bre-X market bubble. But, I learned a valuable lesson. Vale has been a very good addition to many people. I too got in a couple years ago. Gold (that's from mining spanky) has done wonders for me as well.
    Bottom line is market instability IS a good thing for investing. Not a good thing for career employment. Something 6500 members can't figure out.

  • Phillip Morris, why would you invest your mutual funds on mining, that is the most unstable of all, always has been and always will be.

  • Noofie, I have to agree with you, there is blame on both sides for this strike. The thing is the contract was not 100% clear prior to voting, the new pension plan is not that big a deal, especially now knowing that existing employees can enroll. what the biggest problem is the bonus and transfers. The fear is that if we allow Vale to change the bonus, it opens the door to future changes and also the fact that it is performance based a crock, I a boss does not like you you will get little or no bonus and management has done a poor job at selecting what is to be evaluated, I have seen where some items were increadibly impossible to acheive, so really would not be fair to the workers.

  • Article says "arises from nothing other than Vale's greed and Agnelli's obstinacy.”

    C'mon...lay some blame at the feet of the USW of A's greed and Gerard's ambition.

    There's enough blame to go around folks.

  • Canada’s short term gain may turn out to be Canada's long term pain...

  • While these few, chosen by the NL, the so-called Canadain socialist economic experts don't go further. They don't bother with how gobally Vale is a success story. The company stock price has increased. Generating profits for the investors. Like you and me. Mutual Fund holders. Like you and me.
    A couple chosen viewpoints by a Sudbury paper are used to make it look like the entire earth is against Vale. And therefore support 6500?
    LOL

FacebookTwitterRSSVideophotoNewsletterMobile