Amphitheatre construction to resume this week

Construction at the Grace Hartman Amphitheatre has been dormant for months since initial site development began in November 2009.  Photo by Bill Bradley

Construction at the Grace Hartman Amphitheatre has been dormant for months since initial site development began in November 2009. Photo by Bill Bradley

Jul 21, 2010- 7:50 PM

By: Bill Bradley - Sudbury Northern Life

The chairs of two community festivals say their events have suffered because they were unable to locate their events in Bell Park this summer due to the $5 million renewal of the Grace Hartman Amphitheatre.

However, the city’s manager of parks, Kevan Moxam, said the venue should be ready in time for next year’s festival season, as activity at the construction site is due to resume this week.

On July 14, city council approved the proposal from the lowest bidder for the amphitheatre project, Tribury Construction of Sudbury. Tenders closed July 8.

Initial site development began in November 2009, but there had been on no activity on the site for months.

Moxam said the only possible thing left to be done next spring, after the agreed upon March 31 completion date, could be some landscaping.

He said the reason for the delay in construction this year was because the site design needed to be reworked to include more hard seating and foundation supports for an roof structure over the audience to be possibly built in the future.

What hurt us was having to pay for infrastructure that was freely available to us at Bell Park.

Derek Young,
chair of the Greater Sudbury Celtic Festival and Highland Games

The city also had to make sure the senior levels of government had their money in place for the project to proceed into the construction phase, Moxam added.

“The dollars are in the bank now,” he said.

He said the city may receive money funding from the province to increase the seating capacity at the amphitheatre.

Currently, the project includes 450 hard seats and 1,500 “soft” or grass area seats.

The Greater Sudbury Celtic Festival and Highland Games, which was held in late May, and the Northern Lights Festival Boréal (NLFB), which was held July 9-11, were both hurt because they had to move away from Bell Park this year, organizers said.

“Our attendance was good since we were on a site on Notre Dame Avenue, a major road artery,” Derek Young, chair of the Celtic Festival, said.

“What hurt us was having to pay for infrastructure that was freely available to us at Bell Park.”

He said the stage cost $5,100, an expense not incurred at Bell Park. Another $2,900 was paid for portable washroom facilities. Since Bell Park is equipped with permanent washrooms facilities, it was a new expense for the festival.

These costs added up to a loss of $8,000 out of a festival budget of $43,000, money which could have been invested in next year’s festival, Young said.

NFLB moved to Laurentian University’s athletic field this year. According to Ross Kelly, NLFB chair, attendance was down.

He said for festival patrons, it “just wasn’t the same as Bell Park.”

Kelly said people associate the various events with Bell Park, and enjoy the park setting by the lake.

“I think this points out how critical and important the Bell Park facility is to, not only NLFB, but the other festivals as well,” Kelly said.

He noted the festival had logistical problems, and had to cut back on music stages and other components normally part of the festival.

In an e-mail to NorthernLife.ca, Kelly also noted the vendors and crafters at the festival also suffered a “downturn in revenue.”

“NLFB is anticipating being able to celebrate its 40th anniversary next July in the new amphitheatre and refurbished park and we’re anxiously watching for signs of progress on the new facility.”

 

Read More: Home > Sudbury News

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site.

7 Comments

  • The city should be ashamed. The original amphitheatre was a beautiful design. If the city had done regular repairs and upgrades, there would be no need to build a new one. Shame on Sudbury.

  • "Why demolish the place before tenders, plans etc had been completed?"
    Simple andre, its how counsel works. A 'spoil sport' way of doing business.

    Once the site has been razzed, they have no choice but to have it re-built. Nobody can raise hell and halt it. No one can offer alternatives to upgrade or change plans.

    Look at the history here.
    They ripped out the Centennial Garden a few years back. Not a word to the public. Just did it and it was over.
    Barrydowne arena was the same story. They shut it down. And before anyone could offer ideas to upgrade it, they tore out all the ice plants and boards.
    Kingsway rock cut by Kelsey's. The city started diverting the road and blasting before anyone could offer the alternative of shotcrete and screening.
    Northern Breweries. The city sold the place off without any consultation that perhaps a city banked, co-op brewery would be an idea. Keeping jobs and a now lucrative style micro brewery.
    The Post Office. Torn down and never preserved. Woolworths went in, and now it’s a parking lot.
    $2.2 million on plastic grass sports field. Just build it and once its up, too late!
    The list goes on and on. I’m sure everyone has a story.
    Bottom line is we have a counsel that wants to protect rotting six-pack silos and rusting water towers, but will demolish park structures at a whim. Tear something down, and nobody can question your decision because its too late. $5.5 million is a lot of our money to throw away on a concrete hole that nobody was consulted about.

  • Why demolish the place before tenders, plans etc had been completed? Would it had not been better for the various organisations who use the place to carry on as usual then at the end of the season do the demolition work while the various plans etc are completed. This is not a big project by any means and if you broughr a reputable company in this could be completed in a few months.... by a reputable company i mean someone who does not give backhanders to certain people to get contracts. Roll on election day... thats all i can say!... This current crop of councillors, mayor etc could not organise a pi## up in a brewery!!!

  • Sould have added a simple monolithic dome would have been an ideal design, for cost, ease of construction and durability (they'll last forever) well 30 years the way the city maintains it's buildings.....

  • Drove by today and they had an excavator there moving the pile of dirt around........looked like a city crew working trying to make it look like they were doing something.......

    Anyone here think it'll be up and running for next year? Is there a final design yet? The ONLY roof needed is for the stage area, to protect power and equipment etc

    spectators can bring their own roof it's called an umbrella!

  • $5.5 MILLION for a concrete hole.
    What a waste of money.

    And of course, not one single dime of corporate money solicited.
    Why didn't counsel ponder going to concrete companies and asking for material in exchange for advertising? Why didn't they go to a major corporation (Okay Vale and Xstrata have done way more than their fair share, find someone else) for cash in exchange for naming rights?
    Beverage companies for exclusive sales in exchange for money? Pepsi vs. Coke. Molson vs. Labatt?
    What about Home Depot vs. Lowes or Rona for supplies like lumber, paint, etc? Lighting companies for the sound stage?
    Surely we could have gotten a free, removable tent/roof from the many canvass companies in the province?

    Nope. Just more of the same. Back door deals and over budget plans nobody voted for. Wait and see how this blows up to over $6 million.

  • I couldn't even tell it was on hiatus......:P

FacebookTwitterRSSVideophotoNewsletterMobile