City reviewing legal options on street-sweeping contract

The city's street-sweeping contract with American-based DeAngelo Brothers is being reviewed, according to the city's legal department. File photo.

The city's street-sweeping contract with American-based DeAngelo Brothers is being reviewed, according to the city's legal department. File photo.

Jul 09, 2012- 10:39 AM

Not happy with performance of American-based contractor

By: Darren MacDonald - Sudbury Northern Life

The city is reviewing its legal options when it comes to its street-sweeping contract, which has been plagued with problems for two consecutive years.

The city signed a three-year deal with an American-based company, DeAngelo Brothers, in 2011 to head up the city’s annual street-sweeping program. The city received several complaints last year, and a staff report found the contractor “arrived in the city with insufficient equipment to complete the contract within the designated timeline.”

Similar complaints were received this year, and both times, city workers stepped in to help the contractor complete the work. The work was supposed to be complete by the May long weekend this year, but street sweepers could still be seen working for weeks afterwards.

Ward 2 Coun. Jacques Barbeau, chair of the operations committee, raised the matter July 9, asking staff what is being done to deal with the chronic problems.

“It's not so much the quality this year, as it was the time it took to complete the work, as well as complaints we received from the public,” Barbeau said.

Greg Clausen, the city's general manager of infrastructure services, said they are not happy with the work of the contractor.

“This has been a very contentious issue,” Clausen said. “The contractor has not performed well, in terms of quality or speed.”

He said the city's legal department is reviewing options on the contract and would report back to councillors in August or September with an opinion on the city's options.

Posted by Darren MacDonald
Read More: Home > Sudbury News

Reader's Feedback

Editor’s Note:

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by using the "report abuse" link found in the comments section of this web site. Comment Guidelines


comments powered by Disqus
FacebookTwitterRSSVideophotoNewsletterMobile