HomePolice and Court

Police fight for right to suspend disgraced officers without pay

By: Darren MacDonald - Sudbury Northern Life

 | May 16, 2014 - 5:00 AM |
Greater Sudbury Police Chief Paul Pedersen says the public is often surprised to learn current laws allow officers charged with even the most serious offences to get their full pay until the case go through the courts. File photo.

Greater Sudbury Police Chief Paul Pedersen says the public is often surprised to learn current laws allow officers charged with even the most serious offences to get their full pay until the case go through the courts. File photo.

Currently, they must be paid until case makes its way through court system

 Greater Sudbury Police are supporting a campaign to allow local police chiefs to suspend officers without pay when they are facing serious criminal charges or whose behaviour is so disgraceful, it harms public trust in police.

Chief Paul Pedersen said many people are surprised to learn current laws force them to continue paying officers charged with serious offences until the cases go through the courts.

 “There is absolutely no authority whatsoever for a police organization to suspend an officer and hold back their pay,” Pedersen said Wednesday, after the police services board meeting.

The sole exception is when suspects are being held in police custody, he said. Otherwise, they must be paid their full salary.

“We have to go through a criminal trial first, if we're dealing with a criminal offence, then a Police Act trial after that,” he said. “It creates challenges for police services, it creates challenges for communities, it puts pressure on budgets.”

The Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police has been lobbying for the change since 2007, arguing it not only forces taxpayers to keep paying a disgraced cop, it also sullies the reputation of all police.

The background information in support of the motion cites several examples where disgraced officers were paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for years while facing serious charges. A Toronto officer facing drug, assault, extortion and prostitution charges was paid almost $427,000 while his case made its way through the court system.

A Sudbury police officer facing sexual assault charges in 2006 was paid almost $200,000 while suspended before agreeing to resign from the force as part of a plea agreement.

“We're not talking months, but years – years and years of salary being fronted by taxpayers, where officers are doing no work whatsoever,” Pedersen said.

Other provinces have passed similar laws, including Alberta, British Columbia, Nova Scotia and Quebec. The current legislation in Ontario was passed at a time when dealing with such cases would be done relatively quickly, he said, so the rules made more sense.

“It's about modernizing a piece of legislation for the world we live in today,” Pedersen said.

“The Police Act is an older piece of legislation. It was written in the days when these types of internal employment hearings were done in a matter of days, not months, not years.”

While seeking the ability to suspend police without pay, Pedersen said it would be restricted to cases where the offences or misconduct was serious enough that a conviction would lead to the person being fired anyway.

A policy paper by Ontario's police chiefs says the suspensions would be decided on a case-by-case basis, with discretion being given to police chiefs. The officers
could appeal the decision to the Ontario Civilian Police Commission within 30 days.

“It would very, very limited use, very specific use,” Pedersen said. “We have to also understand the fundamental principals of justice is that people are innocent until proven guilty.”

The motion will go to the Ontario Association of Police Services Board annual general meeting May 21 in Toronto.

Like what you're reading? Click here to make us your homepage today!
Darren MacDonald

Darren MacDonald

Staff Writer


Reader's Feedback

NorthernLife.ca may contain content submitted by readers, usually in the form of article comments. All reader comments and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of NorthernLife.ca. The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that NorthernLife.ca has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to NorthernLife.ca to report any objectionable content by clicking the "X" on the top right of the comment in question. Comment Guidelines

Local Business Directory